[j-nsp] Juniper MX80 IRB

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:31:18 pm Chuck Anderson wrote:

> Finally, JTAC/ATAC can't even figure out the above!!!  I
> have a case open and they *still* haven't come to the
> solution because they haven't realized that "Today Trio
> only supports the old style config" and what that really
> means.

The disconnect between JTAC and the core of the development 
team has always been there, in my opinion. It took a whole 
year of back-and-forth with JTAC on a case that, when it was 
finally escalated to a senior engineer within Juniper, was 
resolved in 30 minutes. No, seriously...

It's easy to assume that just because JTAC work for Juniper, 
they're familiar with JUNOS and the Juniper hardware. But 
this, as I've seen time & time again, really isn't the case.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100728/e90c0cfe/attachment.bin>