[j-nsp] Best practices for ex4200 EoMPLS/CCC

[Gavin Tweedie]

I have two EX4200s back-to-back mapping each copper GE port to the 
corresponding copper GE port on the other over a 10GE uplink port, so a 
total of 48 LSPs (24 ingress, 24 egress) and have no issues.

Not sure if there is a hard coded maximum as so far I've not found a limit.


On 8/02/2011 6:31 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> Thanks. Is there an upper limit to how many LSP's the 4200 can support?
>   Also, can a cross connect be attached to a LSP that is forwarding vpn
> traffic?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Humair Ali<humair.s.ali at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hi Keegan
>>
>> this is actually the case, this is one of the limitations of CCC setup, is
>> that it requires it's own LSP for each CCC connection ,
>> this is the main difference with the l2circuit/l2vpnwhere u can us the same
>> LSP for multiple traffic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 February 2011 21:03, Keegan Holley<keegan.holley at sungard.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings all,
>>>
>>> I'm playing around with  CCC on EX4200's using MX/M's a P routers and I
>>> was
>>> just curious if there are any best practices for this.  Juniper's website
>>> was cryptic as always.  One of the things I noticed was that each
>>> cross-connect reqires it'uires it's own LSP.  Just curious if this was
>>> actually the
>>>
>>> case or if I'm configuring something wrong.
>>>
>>> Keegan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Humair
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp