[j-nsp] redistributing label between rsvp and ldp

[Ivan Ivanov]

Hi Andrew,

You should consider using 'labeld-BGP'. Look at this example:

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/example/vpn-interprovider-vpn-example-multihop-mp-ebgp-with-p-routers.html

HTH,

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:52, Uzi Be <good1 at live.com> wrote:

>
> hi -
> yeah p3 and p4 support both ldp and rsvp, but pe1 can only run rsvp and pe
> 2 can only run ldp.
>
> ce - pe1 - p1 - p2 - p3 -p4 -pe2 - ce
> thanks
> Andrew
>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:04:06 +0800
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] redistributing label between rsvp and ldp
> > From: diogo.montagner at gmail.com
> > To: good1 at live.com
> >
> > Does p3 and p4 support both LDP and RSVP ?
> >
> > ./diogo -montagner
> > JNCIE-M 0x41A
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Uzi Be <good1 at live.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > hi,
> > > I was just testing out to swap labels between two different signaling
> protocols (ldp and rsvp). lets say we have two different network, one is
> running ldp and the other one is running rsvp (same AS, so no inter-as
> options).
> > > ce - pe1 - p1 - p2 - p3 -p4 -pe2 - ce
> > > so pe1 - p1 - p2 -p3 are running rsvp and p4-pe2 are running ldp, and
> edge ce's are using l3vpn. what are the options to have a labeled path from
> pe2 to pe1 (considering that pe1 is not going to run ldp protocol, and pe2
> can't use rsvp so ldp tunneling is not an option here).
> > > thanks in advance for your comments.
> > > Andrew
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



-- 
Best Regards!

Ivan Ivanov