[j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

[Doug Hanks]

Please note there's also the MX5 through MX40 that can be upgraded via a
license to a full MX80 as well.


On 8/7/12 1:56 AM, "Tima Maryin" <timamaryin at mail.ru> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>have a look at:
>https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html
>
>
>and the whole thread:
>https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/023068.html
>
>
>They are about mx480 vs ASR9006, but most of stuff still applies.
>
>
>
>On 07.08.2012 10:22, William Jackson wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being prompted to
>>look at the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any people have operational
>>experience with the ASR9001 platform?
>> Or any thoughts on comparison.
>>
>> These will be used for IPv4/IPv6 eBGP transit and for MPLS L2VPN/VPLS
>>drop offs, thus all the VLAN tagging, rewriting shenanigans!!
>>
>> thanks
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp