[j-nsp] How reliable is EX multichassis? 3300 and 8200 switches

[Doug Hanks]

Should be hitless. You need to configure GRES + NSR + no-split-detection.


On 10/30/12 4:06 PM, "Morgan McLean" <wrx230 at gmail.com> wrote:

>Can anybody give me an idea regarding typical failover times if the master
>in a two switch pair were to die? The quickest I've seen in my testing
>with
>EX3300's is 45 seconds, just for L2 forwarding to continue working, no
>routing. All the ports drop link as well on the secondary switch while
>things switch over. I can have my laptop connected to the secondary
>switch,
>passing traffic up an uplink on the secondary, and if the master dies it
>creates a 45 second interruption.
>
>Normal?
>
>Morgan
>
>On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Giuliano Medalha
><giuliano at wztech.com.br>wrote:
>
>> Robert,
>>
>> It was released by juniper one or two weeks ago I think.
>>
>> Take a look:
>>
>> 
>>https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-series/mx2000/
>>
>> MX2010
>> MX2020
>>
>>
>> 
>>https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-series/mx2000/
>>#specifications
>>
>> But I really don't know if it will support virtual chassis without JCS.
>>
>> Att,
>>
>> Giuliano
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Robert Hass <robhass at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Giuliano Medalha
>>> <giuliano at wztech.com.br> wrote:
>>> > Considering the MX family (240, 480 and 960 with TRIO 3D) and the new
>>> MX-L
>>>
>>> Hi
>>> What is new MX-L - can you write a little mort ? MX80 successor ?
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>