[j-nsp] single ip on two interfaces

[Mike Devlin]

what device(s)?

reth interfaces on SRX's or AE interfaces on EX's sounds like what you are
looking for.

virtual chassis between a couple EX switches, and LACP on the ae interface
which has its physical interfaces across 2 physically separated switches
connected to a server that is using LACP as well should work.  I know
people have done it, i just cant personally speak from experience



On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Morgan McLean <wrx230 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think Mark is referring to bonding under linux...right? Typically bonding
> has an active / passive pair, and it can also round robin sending the
> packets out individual interfaces. Obviously all returning traffic will be
> destined to one mac, which is the active slave at the time.
>
> Bonding also supports LACP though.
>
> Morgan
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw+j-nsp at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Mark Jones <mjones at mnsi.net> wrote:
> > > Is it possible to have the same ip accessible via two interfaces the
> same
> > > way you would on a server.  This is on an mx series router.
> >
> > What do you mean when you say "..the same way you would on a server" ?
> >
> > Assigning the same IP address to separate interfaces (logical or
> > physical) is usually "wrong", unless each interface is in a separate
> > routing instance/VRF.
> >
> > Can you describe your scenario?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dale
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Morgan
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>