[j-nsp] S-NAT-IN-MX5-MX10

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, January 09, 2014 10:31:34 AM Skeeve Stevens 
wrote:

> Anyone got any deployment examples which would make this
> license worth while?

Not to my knowledge, no (well, not in 2014 anyway). N:1 NAT 
is what makes sense.

Back in 200, an ISP I know of was offering 1:1 NAT on their 
service provider network under the guise of making their 
customers more secure. The things people did (or do)...

I'm looking at JAA-NAT with an MS-MPC for NAT64/DNS64.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20140109/45d350d8/attachment.sig>