[j-nsp] EX3300/4300 Switch MPLS CCC Support

[Skeeve Stevens]

I agree... it is quite rude and seems to be just a push for cash
considering what basic features these are.


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering

On 8 November 2014 12:26, Robin Williams <robin.williams at tnp.net.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We currently make some use of the MPLS CCC functionality of EX3200 and
> EX4200 switches with the AFL, but note that their replacements EX3300 and
> EX4300 don't have any MPLS support.  Does anyone know if this is a
> temporary lack of support while the box is being developed further, or is
> there no plans no bring this support back in the new products?  I don't
> like the way the EX3300 is being touted as the replacement for the EX3200
> but the feature set has entirely changed.
>
> I also think it's a bit rich that you now need an EFL license for things
> like OSPF support, where you didn't previously, and for the AFL features
> such as BGP, you now need both an EFL *AND* and AFL where you previously
> only needed an AFL.
>
> Would be interested to hear other opinions on this, to me it all seems
> like a bit of a silly move on the part of Juniper and a gift to Cisco.
>
> Regards,
> Robin.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>