[j-nsp] Throughput testing tools on Juniper?

[Shanawaz]

Thanks Giuliano

Is there any good documentation I can follow for my combination of
hardware?

I am trying to follow the example here..
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos15.1/topics/example/rfc2544-benchmarking-test-layer-3-ipv4-service.html#jd0e654

But I only see the mode 'reflector' on both sides.

I have 2 x enhanced SCB, a DPCE 4x 10GE R, a MPC2 and 2 x MSDPC

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Giuliano Medalha <giuliano at wztech.com.br>
wrote:

> But for MX240, MX480 and MX960 you will need to combine SCB, MPC and MIC
> to test the chassis ...
>
> There is a lot of combinations and possibilities ... SCBE, SCBE2, MPC1,
> MPC2, MPC3, MPC4, MPC5, NG-MPC-2 and NG-MPC-3. A lot of MIC types ... gig,
> 10gig, 40gig and 100gig ...
>
> Are you going to test performance Gbps and PPS ?  Using TCP and UDP ?
> Mixed mode and 64 bytes ?
>
> Att,
>
> Giuliano
>
> Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
> Systems Engineer
> +55 (17) 3011-3811
> +55 (17) 98112-5394
> JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE
> giuliano at wztech.com.br
> http://www.wztech.com.br/
>
>
>
> ​
> WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS.
> Copyright © 2015 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved.
>
> IMPORTANTE:
> As informações deste e-mail e o conteúdo dos  eventuais  documentos anexos
> são confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinatário. Se o
> leitor  desta  mensagem  não  for o seu destinatário,
> fica desde já notificado de que não poderá  divulgar,  distribuir ou, sob
> qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a terceiros das informações e do conteúdo
> dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, favor comunicar imediatamente
> o remetente, respondendo este e-mail ou telefonando ao mesmo, e em seguida
> apague-o.
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are
> solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review,
> transmission,  dissemination or other use of this information is
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer, including
> any copies.
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Shanawaz <shanawaz at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> We are looking to run the test on a few different MX platforms (5, 80,
>> 240,
>> 480, 960)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Tomasz Mikołajek <tmikolajek at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi.
>> > You can configure rfc 2544 test. What Juniper device you have?
>> >
>> >
>> > W dniu czwartek, 4 lutego 2016 Shanawaz <shanawaz at gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> >
>> >> Hey Folks,
>> >>
>> >> Are there any tools similar to iperf (or ttcp on cisco) that we can run
>> >> between 2 Juniper routers (from the CLI or the shell) to test
>> throughput
>> >> between the 2 devices?
>> >>
>> >> We are suspecting a hard rate-limit placed in an upstream ISP segment
>> >> between the 2 devices. It would be nice just to test between the
>> routers
>> >> at
>> >> both ends of the ISP segment rather than using machines that are a few
>> >> more
>> >> subnets away.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Shan
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>