[j-nsp] Core network design for an ISP
Matthew Crocker
matthew at corp.crocker.com
Thu Mar 24 19:57:14 EDT 2016
Hello,
What is the current best practice for carrying full tables in MX series routers? I have 3 new MX480s coming soon and will use them to rebuild my core network (currently a mix of MX240 & MX80 routers). MPC-NG (w/ 20x1g & 10x10g MICS )& RE-S-X6-64G-BB.
I’m running MPLS now and have full tables in the default route instance. Does it make more sense (i.e. more secure core) to run full tables in a separate virtual-router? I’ve been doing this small ISP thing for 20+ years, Cisco before, Juniper now, I’ve always bashed my way through.
Looking for a book, NANOG presentation or guide on what is current best practice with state of the art gear.
MPLS? BGP? IS-IS? LDP? etc.
The network is a triangle (A -> B -> C -> A), MX480 at each POP, 10g connections between POPs, 10g connections to IX & upstreams. Most customers are fed redundantly from A & B
Thanks
-Matt
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list