[j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?
Raphael Maunier
raphael at zoreole.com
Tue Dec 12 08:51:30 EST 2017
Same here.
15.1 seems to be … not a good choice ( EX3300 / EX2200 )
For QFX10k/5k, I’m not sure If we can start using 17.2R2 or just wait for 17.3R2
Raphael
On 12/12/2017 10:52, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Karl Gerhard" <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of karl_gerh at gmx.at> wrote:
Hello
we've had very bad experience with Junos 15.1 on our switches (EX4550, EX4300, EX4200).
Now we're getting new MX960s with 2xRE-S-X6-64G and unfortunately the minimum required Junos version for this RE is 15.1. Can anyone share their experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960? Is it as bad as it is on the switches? Would it be wiser to jump directly to 16.1/16.2/17.1/17.2/17.3?
We're especially interested in bugs/problems related to MC-LAG.
Regards
Karl
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list