[j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

[Sebastian Becker]

I recommend Junos 16.1R4 as minimum. They have done some improvements to the software quality.
We are on 16.1R4-S6.3 and it looks good so far.

— 
Sebastian Becker

> Am 12.12.2017 um 10:52 schrieb Karl Gerhard <karl_gerh at gmx.at>:
> 
> 
> Hello
> 
> we've had very bad experience with Junos 15.1 on our switches (EX4550, EX4300, EX4200).
> Now we're getting new MX960s with 2xRE-S-X6-64G and unfortunately the minimum required Junos version for this RE is 15.1. Can anyone share their experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960? Is it as bad as it is on the switches? Would it be wiser to jump directly to 16.1/16.2/17.1/17.2/17.3?
> 
> We're especially interested in bugs/problems related to MC-LAG.
> 
> Regards
> Karl
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp