[j-nsp] LDP VPLS - Multi-homing

[Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr]

Hello Aaron,

If I may, I would advice you to drop LSYS for two reasons :

1/ on a practical level, it's more constraints and limitations than it sounds on the paper. After 5 years of running it into production, we have phased it out two weeks ago.

2/ it is dying and replacement feature (logical DOM) is planned for 2018 according to my SE. So, no more developments planned.

My 2 cents.



> Le 10 oct. 2017 à 02:45, Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> a écrit :
> 
> Ah, I see what you are asking.  I don't know, perhaps someone on list knows
> the particulars.
> 
> About the multiple active fwd'ing paths for mhome'd pe-ce... I think someone
> told me that is a benefit that evpn brings to the table... but I heard it
> has something to do with per-vlan load sharing across those active/active
> mhomed sites.
> 
> Don't know yet, since I'm just diving into evpn, and am already discouraged
> that I read that evpn isn't supported in lsys, ... lsys is the basis for all
> my lab testing.  Oh well, perhaps I'll pull a another acx5048 from the
> warehouse and give it a whirl 
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp