[j-nsp] Mixing v4/v6 in other places (was Re: Mixing v4/v6 neighbors in BGP groups)

[Rob Foehl]

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Rob Foehl wrote:

> I may have been insufficiently specific...  I'm referring to:
>
> group example {
>     neighbor 192.0.2.0;
>     neighbor 2001:db8::;
> } 
>
> vs.
>
> group example-ipv4 {
>     neighbor 192.0.2.0;
> } 
>
> group example-ipv6 {
>     neighbor 2001:db8::;
> }

Hey folks,

Appreciate all the responses here, even those which apparently assumed I'd 
been bored and daydreaming about trying to wedge both address families 
into a single session -- hopefully the six week late reply is sufficient 
proof otherwise... :)

I have a few follow up questions on related topics, especially for those 
in favor of separate peer groups:

Are you doing anything differently in your IGP?  (Okay, a bit of a loaded 
question, I know...)  What about LDP and/or RSVP transport?

How are you handling v6 TE -- nothing yet, 6PE, inet6 shortcuts, native v6 
LSPs, waiting for SR to take over the world, something else?  Which Junos 
release(s) were necessary to get there?

I'm still carrying v6 traffic around natively, though not sure how much 
longer that'll be workable.  6PE seems like a step backward when the 
network is already 100% v6 enabled, but then I haven't quite wrapped my 
head around all of the options here...  Thanks in advance for any clue.

-Rob