[j-nsp] MX960 vs MX10K

[Tom Beecher]

You can still get 100G ports on the 960 chassis with MPC5E/6/7s , depending
on what kind of density you require.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:42 AM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>
>
> On 4/Mar/20 16:36, Tom Beecher wrote:
> > It really depends on what you're going to be doing,but I still have
> quite a
> > few MX960s out there running pretty significant workloads without issues.
> >
> > I would suspect you hit the limits of the MS-MPCs way before the limits
> of
> > the chassis.
>
> The classic MX chassis are nowhere close to running out of ideas.
>
> But Juniper have to always be pushing the tech., so emphasis will be on
> the MX1000 (although not necessarily at the expense of the MX960/480/240).
>
> I still believe if your use-case is not overly complicated, you may find
> the MX960/480 to be cheaper if you don't need 100Gbps ports.
>
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>