[Outages-discussion] Cogent disconnecting Russia

Fri Mar 4 16:28:16 EST 2022

Sometimes they intersect… In this case, World Affairs -> Action by Cogent -> Outage.

Do you really have trouble following that line?

Owen

> On Mar 4, 2022, at 12:37 , Savarrah Goss <Savarrah.Goss at hamiltonrelay.com> wrote:
> 
> Isn’t this for outage reporting and not discussing world affairs?
>  
> Savarrah Goss | Hamilton Relay 
> 
> O: 229.338.7086 | C: 229.854.8872 | Savarrah.Goss at hamiltonrelay.com <mailto:Savarrah.Goss at hamiltonrelay.com> | HamiltonRelay.com <http://www.hamiltonrelay.com/>
> <image001.png> <https://hamiltonrelay.com/>
> <image002.png>  Hamilton Relay <http://facebook.com/HamiltonRelay>  |  <image003.png> @HamiltonRelay <http://twitter.com/HamiltonRelay>
>  
> From: Outages-discussion <outages-discussion-bounces at outages.org <mailto:outages-discussion-bounces at outages.org>> On Behalf Of Sean Brown
> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2022 3:27 PM
> To: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>>
> Cc: Outages Discussion <outages-discussion at outages.org <mailto:outages-discussion at outages.org>>
> Subject: Re: [Outages-discussion] Cogent disconnecting Russia
>  
> **This email originated from outside of the Hamilton network.  Please use extra caution with links and attachments. **
> 
> I disagree. It seems pretty obvious the ’neutral power’ reference are the signatory nations to the Convention not engaged in conflict and not every private entity therein. As such the US (in this case) couldn’t direct Cogent to disconnect from Russia and not Ukraine, but Cogent is free, as a private entity, to choose not to do business with companies in Russia.
> 
> 
> The US is not directing Cogent to this action so the US is not in violation of the Convention, and Cogent is not a signatory to the Convention.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 2:59 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
>  
> It’s clear from the second paragraph of I.9 that this convention is written
> to apply to “powers” (i.e. governments) and that each government is expected
> to enforce compliance by companies operating under its “flag” for lack of a
> better term.
>  
> As such, it seems, at least in theory that Cogent would be expected to be
> of the same posture (neutrality or not) as the U.S. overall. I think it would
> be hard to claim that the U.S. is either entirely neutral or entirely in support
> of Ukraine under current conditions, so I guess that leaves Cogent free to
> choose anywhere on that spectrum they wish as well.
>  
> Personally, I’m of mixed opinion. I support doing whatever we can to hurt
> Putin and the leadership of Russia that has created this situation, but I am
> not convinced that cutting off access to outside information for millions of
> Russian citizens is not counterproductive to that end.
>  
> Owen
>  
> 
> 
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 11:36 , Matthew Petach <matt at petach.org <mailto:matt at petach.org>> wrote:
>  
>  
>  
>  
> If they're going to follow the War Conventions in the Hauge, they should likewise terminate all customer connections to Ukraine as well, if they're considering themselves to be a neutral party.  
>  
> Of course, that doesn't apply if they're taking a side as a participant in the conflict.
>  
> Shamelessly copying from Sean Donelan...
> 
> https://www.icrc.org/en <https://www.icrc.org/en>
> 
> Convention (V) respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and
> Persons in Case of War on Land. The Hague, 18 October 1907.
> 
> CHAPTER I : THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS - ART. 8.
> 
> Art. 8. A neutral Power is not called upon to forbid or restrict the use
> on behalf of the belligerents of telegraph or telephone cables or of
> wireless telegraphy apparatus belonging to it or to companies or private
> individuals.
> 
> 
> CHAPTER I : THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF NEUTRAL POWERS - ART. 9.
> 
> Art. 9. Every measure of restriction or prohibition taken by a neutral
> Power in regard to the matters referred to in Articles 7 and 8
> must be impartially applied by it to both belligerents.
> 
> A neutral Power must see to the same obligation being observed by
> companies or private individuals owning telegraph or telephone cables or
> wireless telegraphy apparatus.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022, 11:20 Andy Ringsmuth <andy at andyring.com <mailto:andy at andyring.com>> wrote:
> Apparently effective at noon EDT, which would be a couple hours ago.
> 
> Washington Post, but here’s a paywall-free archive:
> 
> https://archive.ph/TFgyg <https://archive.ph/TFgyg>
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org <mailto:Outages-discussion at outages.org>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion>
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Outages-discussion mailing list
> Outages-discussion at outages.org <mailto:Outages-discussion at outages.org>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion>
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This email and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete all copies of this email.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages-discussion/attachments/20220304/29c68115/attachment.htm>