[VoiceOps] Acme SBC geographic redundancy

Carlos Alcantar carlos at race.com
Thu Sep 3 19:29:16 EDT 2009



Have you talked to your Metaswitch se they are now fully supporting the
acme with the Metaswitch so you don't have to be dealing with 2
different groups pointing the finger at each other saying it's there
fault.  We purchased the acme directly thru meta so we didn't have to
deal with so many parties.



Carlos Alcantar

Race Telecommunications, Inc.

101 Haskins Way

South San Francisco, CA 94080

P: 650.649.3550

F: 650.649.3551




From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org
[mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Brandon Buckner
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:57 PM
To: voiceops at voiceops.org
Subject: [VoiceOps] Acme SBC geographic redundancy


Is anyone doing geographic redundancy with their Acme Packet SBCs? We've
got an HA pair of nn4250s right now and are installing a new Metaswitch
system that is geographically redundant at two locations with external
call agents, TDM links, etc. We'd like to get SIP to be the same. I'm
still waiting on a response from our Acme SE about it but wanted to see
what others had done, if anything. I figure some discussion will spark
questions I can bring up with Acme as well.



Brandon Buckner
Switching Technician / VoIP Admin
Iowa Network Services
brandonb at netins.com




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20090903/0bcf628d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the VoiceOps mailing list