[VoiceOps] MOH server

[Alex Balashov]

The argument in support of Asterisk arises precisely because, of all 
the possible applications of Asterisk, including many that require 
relatively specialised skills, minimal Asterisk knowledge is required 
to get it going.  It's sad to waste money on something that really is 
fairly trivial to do with Asterisk.

I'm the last to say everything with open-source VoIP stuff is trivial 
and that you should always go that route, but in this case, it'd 
really be silly not to, IMHO.

On 06/05/2012 01:18 PM, Adam Baird wrote:

> Thanks all,
>
> The justification for a premises based device is to allow the customer
> to manage their own live source however they please without having to
> engage us. An ATA in this case is a simple solution with a small
> footprint, low cost and simple administration.
>
> For those who ask why we wouldn't just build it with Asterisk, I would
> say that it is primarily a matter of resource allocation. It is often
> simpler to perform an interop on an existing device and deploy it than
> it would be to build a new service, even if it is ‘just Asterisk’
> (specially given that we are not an Asterisk shop).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/