[VoiceOps] Odd "TOS violation" op intercept?

[Jared Geiger]

Did anyone narrow down an offending region/carrier? I'm curious. I haven't
gotten any reports, but my customers are regionalized.

Regards,
Jared Geiger


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Paul Timmins <paul at timmins.net> wrote:

> Reminds me of the intercepts that MagicJack (Ymax) was doing to calls
> delivered to them across local interconnection groups that they perceived
> should have come across feature group d. It was all about making sure to
> monetize intercarrier compensation as precisely as possible (read: not
> allowing a single misrouted call to terminate to the wrong groups, for fear
> a few tenths of a cent might slip from their grasp)
>
> On May 22, 2013, at 12:51 AM, April Jones <april at teliax.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi voiceops,
> >
> > I've had a rash of tickets since Friday from various customers, to
> varied destinations over multiple vendors where I'm getting a terrible
> operator intercept/recording, and I'm wondering if anyone else has heard it
> or knows who is playing it.
> >
> > Recording plays "This call was routed in violation of our terms of
> service" then asks to record the orig/term and advises to report it to
> "your phone provider."
> >
> > I haven't found anything definitive, but I also haven't had a lot of
> time to really dig in...
> >
> > april j.
> > _______________________________________________
> > VoiceOps mailing list
> > VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130525/6bf21ab1/attachment.html>