[VoiceOps] Odd "TOS violation" op intercept?
frnkblk at iname.com
Sat May 25 16:55:03 EDT 2013
We heard a few reports this week (Wednesday?) related to a number we have in
a CenturyLink exchange that's forwarded to our main office. It subsided
later in the day and I haven't heard of any new reports.
From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Jared
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Odd "TOS violation" op intercept?
Did anyone narrow down an offending region/carrier? I'm curious. I haven't
gotten any reports, but my customers are regionalized.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Paul Timmins <paul at timmins.net
<mailto:paul at timmins.net> > wrote:
Reminds me of the intercepts that MagicJack (Ymax) was doing to calls
delivered to them across local interconnection groups that they perceived
should have come across feature group d. It was all about making sure to
monetize intercarrier compensation as precisely as possible (read: not
allowing a single misrouted call to terminate to the wrong groups, for fear
a few tenths of a cent might slip from their grasp)
On May 22, 2013, at 12:51 AM, April Jones <april at teliax.com
<mailto:april at teliax.com> > wrote:
> Hi voiceops,
> I've had a rash of tickets since Friday from various customers, to varied
destinations over multiple vendors where I'm getting a terrible operator
intercept/recording, and I'm wondering if anyone else has heard it or knows
who is playing it.
> Recording plays "This call was routed in violation of our terms of
service" then asks to record the orig/term and advises to report it to "your
> I haven't found anything definitive, but I also haven't had a lot of time
to really dig in...
> april j.
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the VoiceOps