[VoiceOps] Multi Tenant Commercial Softswitch Besides Broadsoft

[Peter Rad.]

Well, there was a backlash from clients when it happened, but at this 
point BSFT has run out of prospects who will dump $1 million into the 
HPBX game. Since they won't be selling any new BroadWorks instances; 
they have to crank up the end user licensing - and the carriers weren't 
doing that fast enough. So BSFT thought they could do white-label 
better. They are engineers after all.

- Peter @ RAD-INFO


On 8/1/2014 9:30 AM, Pete E wrote:
> They do. It seemed like a conflict of interests, given that it makes 
> them a competitor to their own customers, but so far we've not had an 
> issue with it. There are plenty of other white labels out there too.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com 
> <mailto:colton.conor at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Peter,
>
>     Are you saying that Broadsoft now offers hosted white labeled to
>     service providers without the requirements of hardware or purchase?
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20140801/b1e2055d/attachment.html>