[VoiceOps] Multi Tenant Commercial Softswitch Besides Broadsoft

Wed Aug 6 13:24:04 EDT 2014

We use a virtualized asterisk per client - makes feature sets very
powerful. Then we have a centralized core for additional features that
Asterisk can not provide.  Its not auto provisioning, but we're aiming for
B2B vs. self-service market. Billing is done via flat rate or A2Billing.

It'll come close to meta switch or broad soft but you will need to service
your clients. BUT you wold be 100% opensource.

Aryn H. K. Nakaoka
anakaoka at trinet-hi.com

Direct: 808.356.2901
Fax : 808.356.2919

Call me with our Browser Phone : https://encrypted.alohatone.com/3562901

Tri-net Solutions
733 Bishop St. #1170
Honolulu, HI 96813
http://www.trinet-hi.com

Aloha Tone PBX  http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs

EncryptedHawaii.com : http://tinyurl.com/emailchainofcustody

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information contained in this email and any
attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.
Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by
replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from
your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:38 AM, MiRTA PBX team <info at mirtapbx.com> wrote:

> I almost agree with you, but I think instead of saying "The drawback to
> Asterisk is you have to add lots of extra stuff" I will say "The drawback
> to Asterisk is you have to DISABLE a lots of extra stuff". Yes, if you are
> doing a pure SIP routing, you may disable IAX and all other VoIP protocol
> you do not need, you may disable all applications you don't use and reduce
> asterisk to the bare minimum, but are they really hurting you? I cannot
> compare asterisk to other VoIP software because I just know asterisk, but
> having something "more" was never been a problem. Problems can arise when
> you need a feature and you do not have it. We are working in a highly
> competitive market where we fight to the death for every single customer,
> trying to pleasant them as much as we can. Often clients have silly
> requests and I appreciate when I have a software even capable to play chess
> with the caller while on hold.
>
> Leandro
>
>
> 2014-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Eric Wieling <EWieling at nyigc.com>:
>
>> A well spec’d Asterisk box can handle well 500+ calls if audio is not
>> going through Asterisk.    The drawback to Asterisk is you have to add lots
>> of extra stuff. The few GUIs availabe for Asterisk are all designed for
>> SMBs, not for a carrier.  I love Asterisk, but it would not come close to
>> fufilling the original poster’s needs for things like SMS (for some values
>> of “SMS”).
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] *On Behalf Of *John
>> Curry
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 05, 2014 1:52 PM
>> *To:* 'Chris Carabello'; voiceops at voiceops.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Multi Tenant Commercial Softswitch Besides
>> Broadsoft
>>
>>
>>
>> Other considerations (cost)
>>
>>
>>
>> An Asterisk 1U server sotswitch will comfortably handle 100 concurrent
>> calls, as a business grows Additional 1U Servers are added. If a 1U switch
>> would crash, automatic failover to other 1U load balanced softswitch
>> servers. Because of the lower cost entry redundancy in multiple
>> Co-locations is easily accomplished. Live CDR can be pushed to the billing
>> product of your choice.
>>
>>
>>
>> A class 4 or 5 tandem switch is very expensive. Multiple co-location is
>> next to impossible unless you have seven digits to invest.
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>> [image: cid:7A1F90D5-2114-4F17-B9C6-0230EB9EAD47 at hsd1.pa.comcast.net.]
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org
>> <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>] *On Behalf Of *Chris Carabello
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 4, 2014 8:56 PM
>> *To:* voiceops at voiceops.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Multi Tenant Commercial Softswitch Besides
>> Broadsoft
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m a new member to the group and happy to contribute to this thread.
>>
>>
>>
>> For background purposes, Metaswitch has hundreds of service providers
>> globally using our carrier-grade platform to deliver a complete Class 5,
>> Trunking, and Hosted PBX solution and Accession UC Client to a broad range
>> of enterprise customers.  We also have a number of service providers who
>> offer a wholesale “whitelabel” offering as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ll be happy to address specific questions about the breadth of our
>> solution.  Suffice it to say that service providers, large and small, are
>> winning in the market with our feature set.  We are also deployed in
>> service providers who offer the same enterprise offering alongside those
>> which is built on other vendors’ platforms (as a result of M&A).  In other
>> scenarios, service providers have opted to completely migrate from other
>> platforms to Metaswitch.
>>
>>
>>
>> In other cases, we provide the Class 4, Media Gateway functions (we can
>> talk TDM and SIP), and/or SBC, which has been reviewed favorably by
>> independent analysts and the market alike and can be deployed on HW or
>> virtualized as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Carabello
>>
>> Senior Director - Product Marketing
>>
>> 510-217-2019
>>
>>
>>
>> *METASWITCH NETWORKS *
>>
>> THE BRAINS OF THE NEW GLOBAL NETWORK
>> *www.metaswitch.com <http://www.metaswitch.com>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20140806/f27621b7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20046 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20140806/f27621b7/attachment-0001.png>