[VoiceOps] Phone Numbers with Calling Restrictions

[Matt Yaklin]

Tim,

But who exactly is dropping the call? The first ILEC who gets control
of the call? A Level3 type company?

I do not think any of my switches, broadsoft, asterisk, etc... would
treat it any differently then all the other numbers that go through it.

Just curious who is actually enforcing the special service code.

matt at g4.net

On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Tim Donahue wrote:

> David,
> Just to clarify, the question I was asking has no bearing on the LD calling for the number.  This is a number that we
> ported to our service for a client, and calls were failing when the incoming call was a LD call.  We found out while
> trying to diagnose the routing problem that there are dialing restrictions on the entire exchange to limit these numbers
> to intralata traffic only.
> 
> After some off-list conversations, I did some digging into the documentation for the LERG and found that there is a
> "Special Service Code" that shows when a block of numbers has been designated for intralata calls only, and there are over
> 1400 blocks of numbers with these restrictions.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Hiers, David <David.Hiers at adp.com> wrote:
>
>       To answer a question that you did not ask:
>
>        
>
>       Q: "Can I order a TN without a default LD PIC/CIC?"
>
>       A: "Yes"
>
>       See: http://www.ag.ny.gov/consumer-frauds/switching-or-canceling-your-long-distance-telephone-service
>
>        
>
>        
>
>       I am unaware of entire blocks of this kind of thing being forced onto subscribers, however.
>
>        
>
>        
>
>        
>
>       David
>
>        
>
>       From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Tim Donahue
>       Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 08:17
>       To: voiceops at voiceops.org
>       Subject: [VoiceOps] Phone Numbers with Calling Restrictions
>
>        
>
>       Hi all,
>
>        
> 
> I am wondering if anyone has ever heard of DIDs that are restricted so that only intra-lata or local calls are
> allowed to complete.  We have never come across this before, but we are being told that one of our DIDs falls into a
> block with these restrictions in New York.
> 
>  
> 
> Any pointers to information about this would be appreciated.
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
>  
> 
> Tim
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>       This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information
>       that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an
>       authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
>       communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
>       immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
> 
> 
> 
>