[VoiceOps] G.729 A/B Experiences

James Milko jmilko at bandwidth.com
Mon Mar 14 09:01:54 EDT 2016


Biased as all get out, but if your carrier doesn't support at least 729 and
711 find a new carrier.

JM

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Calvin Ellison <calvin.ellison at voxox.com>
wrote:

> ​Could you put their voice on wires (POTS/PRI/VoIP), and the rest of their
> data on fixed wireless?
> This doesn't necessarily give you any more calls per Kbps, but at least
> keeps voice and data independent. Wires for dependability, radio waves for
> bandwidth at the cost of some latency & packet loss.
>
> One consideration when using G.729 is how you're going to deliver it to a
> mostly non-G.729 world. Are your not-quite-broadband customers attached to
> some PBX that will handle it and send G.711 to your carriers? That's going
> to cost some CPU or dedicated transcoding hardware. Will your providers
> accept G.729 and transcode for you? Is there a cost for it? Or will your
> carriers blindly throw your G.729 at their LCR and hope something sticks?
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20160314/0ad38d9f/attachment.html>


More information about the VoiceOps mailing list