[VoiceOps] Question about billing on SIP trunks
Ryan Delgrosso
ryandelgrosso at gmail.com
Thu Sep 20 19:20:44 EDT 2018
So if it were me operating whoever your provider is, I would take the
diversion as the originating number of the leg in question and bill
appropriately, as the PAI/FROM in this case is display only.
That being said, does the provider youre with make a distinction between
local/LD? thats relatively archaic these days as the aggregate cost of
national termination is so low most stopped caring, it might be worth
considering moving to another provider.
On 9/20/2018 1:34 PM, Peter Crawford wrote:
> Hello voice-ops:
>
> Enterprise admin here.
>
> We just converted from ISDN to SIP (and changed providers) and we're
> seeing some undesirable billing behavior. I'm hoping I can get some
> objective feedback from different providers.
>
> If a call comes into our system, and we forward it off-net using the
> SIP trunks (using either "standard" call forwarding or a call
> forking/paralleling feature like Avaya's EC500 or Cisco's Single
> Number Reach), we send the call with the SIP FROM header of the
> original caller (which is desirable to preserve callerID). We also
> include a Diversion Header with one of our phone numbers (the original
> destination of the call).
>
> We're being billed based on the *original* calling number, which
> sometimes results in long distance charges, even if this leg of the
> call is local to us. This is particularly onerous if the inbound call
> is international!
>
> So, the question is- what *should* we be billed on: FROM or DIVERSION.
>
> At one point, the provider indicated that P-Charge-Info was supported,
> but now backing away from that.
>
> Do we have any recourse (technical or otherwise)?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20180920/7bece18a/attachment.html>
More information about the VoiceOps
mailing list