[VoiceOps] Hotel Phone

[Andy Brezinsky]

There are a number of ways to do this without having a DID assigned to 
each device with address information.  A number of systems also assign a 
callback number to anyone that dials 911 which tacks up a translation 
for that number for a period of time so they can call back the user 
directly.

Example onfiguration details for AudioCodes and Sonus with skype can be 
seen here: 
https://ucvnext.org/2016/03/enhanced-911-in-skype4b-server-and-lync-server-part-4/


On 4/5/19 1:22 AM, Matthew Yaklin wrote:
> That is correct. A DID for every phone and listed by e911. For example 
> in NH it is law schools have it now days to get their special erate 
> funding. When they call 911 they see very detailed information about 
> floor, room, etc.. and the phone can be called back directly. We do it 
> for every customer that has that specific need.
>
> Matthew Yaklin
> Network Engineer
> FirstLight
> 359 Corporate Drive │ Portsmouth, NH 03801
> Mobile 603-845-5031
> myaklin at firstlight.net | www.firstlight.net
> This email may contain FirstLight confidential and/or privileged 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed
> not to read, disclose or otherwise use this transmission and to 
> immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended
> to waive any applicable privileges.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:40:11 PM
> *To:* Matthew Yaklin
> *Cc:* Jason Kuylen; VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Hotel Phone
> So if you had e911 per room, that would be quite a bit of e911 
> charges. Most hotels I have seen have a 10 to 1 ratio for rooms to 
> phone lines. So a 100 room hotel gets 10 phone lines from the LEC. Are 
> you saying we would have to pay bandwidth.com <http://bandwidth.com> 
> or whomever we got our e911 from a separate e911 charge per room? 
> Isn't e911 tied to DID? In that case you would need a DID per hotel 
> room? To actuately say room 302 is on floor 3, and room 302 for example.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:21 AM Matthew Yaklin <myaklin at firstlight.net 
> <mailto:myaklin at firstlight.net>> wrote:
>
>     I imagine you want to make sure E911 information is super accurate
>     with actual floors and room numbers. Physical address and call
>     back number is correct. By making that accurate and having the
>     customer sign that phones cannot move you cover a serious base.
>     Perhaps even a sticker on the phone saying such would be great to.
>
>
>     *Matthew Yaklin*
>     Network Engineer
>     *FirstLight*
>     359 Corporate Drive │ Portsmouth, NH 03801
>     Mobile 603-845-5031
>     myaklin at firstlight.net <mailto:myaklin at firstlight.net> |
>     www.firstlight.net <http://www.firstlight.net>
>     /This email may contain FirstLight confidential and/or privileged
>     information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed/
>     /not to read, disclose or otherwise use this transmission and to
>     immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended/
>     /to waive any applicable privileges./
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* VoiceOps <voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org
>     <mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org>> on behalf of Jason Kuylen
>     <kuylenj at eastex.com <mailto:kuylenj at eastex.com>>
>     *Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:08:32 PM
>     *To:* VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Hotel Phone
>
>     I’ve never heard of any other 911 requirement for hotel or
>     business phones outside of not have to dial 9 to dial 911, ie
>     9911. Kari’s Law.
>
>     Can anyone provide a link with more information?
>
>     Thanks.
>
>
>     Important/Confidential: This communication and any files or
>     documents attached to it are intended only for the use of the
>     person(s) or entity to which it is addressed. It contains
>     information that may be confidential and exempt from disclosure
>     under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of
>     this communication, you are hereby notified that the copying,
>     disclosure, distribution, storage, retransmission or other use of
>     this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>     this communication by mistake, please notify the sender
>     immediately and destroy all forms of this communication
>     (electronic or paper).
>     _______________________________________________
>     VoiceOps mailing list
>     VoiceOps at voiceops.org <mailto:VoiceOps at voiceops.org>
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20190405/93237f9b/attachment-0001.html>