[VoiceOps] Bandwidth East Coast Issues

Mike Hammett voiceops at ics-il.net
Sun Sep 26 17:19:42 EDT 2021


I have IXes in areas where Inteliquent and Peerless have POPs. They haven't had any interest. 


I don't understand. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Paul Timmins" <paul at timmins.net> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <voiceops at ics-il.net> 
Cc: "Pete Mundy" <pete at mac.geek.nz>, "VoiceOps" <voiceops at voiceops.org> 
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 3:53:47 PM 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Bandwidth East Coast Issues 

I just looked into all the big wholesalers, and they all have terrible peering policies, and are rarely at public exchanges even when it would be trivial *looks at Inteliquent and Equinox Chicago* this is kind of embarrassing for the industry. 





On Sep 26, 2021, at 10:33 AM, Mike Hammett < voiceops at ics-il.net > wrote: 


That announcement by VoIP.ms predates the bandwidth.com resolution. 



Also, why wouldn't VoIP.MS (or rather, their host webhosting companies) have PNIs with bandwidth.com ? Oh, well, maybe because like many other VoIP providers, their IP network sucks. Few POPs, no IXes, a technical activity (BGP peering) requires a trip to the account team, etc. 


https://peeringdb.com/net/1835 


https://radar.qrator.net/as12130/peerings#startDate=2021-06-26&endDate=2021-09-26&tab=current 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 



----- Original Message -----

From: "Pete Mundy via VoiceOps" < voiceops at voiceops.org > 
To: "VoiceOps" < voiceops at voiceops.org > 
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 1:47:18 AM 
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Bandwidth East Coast Issues 


Not sure if Slashdot does... 

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/21/09/26/0014216/voipms-battles-week-long-sustained-ddos-for-ransom-attack 


> On 26/09/2021, at 12:47 PM, Peter Beckman via VoiceOps <voiceops at voiceops.org> wrote: 
> 
> BW Considers the incident resolved. 

_______________________________________________ 
VoiceOps mailing list 
VoiceOps at voiceops.org 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops 

_______________________________________________ 
VoiceOps mailing list 
VoiceOps at voiceops.org 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20210926/1088175d/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the VoiceOps mailing list