At 12:22 PM -0800 3/4/02, Alex Zinin wrote:
>Howard,
>
>> I also rejoice in Joel's words.
>
>> Can we have a straw poll about whether it is indeed worth separating
>> requirements from architecture, leaving open the possibility of
>> having multiple architectures?
>
>I thought [probably naively] that this was the main assumption already.
>
>The question here seems to be whether we need to have one set of
>requirements or it is ok to come up with multiple [competing] sets.
>My vote is for one set.
>
>Alex
Certainly the development of "one set" would still go through the
usual mail list full-contact review process.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:03 EDT