Don't they need to both be FastE ports - I did not think you could build
an EtherChannel with a port slower than FastE
On Mar 7, 2001 Elijah Kagan spake:
> I think EtherChannel might do the trick...
>
> -- elijah
>
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kent Yu wrote:
>
> > Vinod,
> >
> > Apart from others suggested, you could also try to put them into one bridge group, and create a BVI interface.
> >
> > HTH
> > Kent Yu
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Vinod Anthony Joseph Cherunni
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:54 AM
> > Subject: [nsp] REG: Dual Ethernet Ports on Cisco 7206-VXR
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > In a Cisco 7206-VXR with two Ethernet ports (One avaialable on the NPE-300, & another as a module), Is it not possible to build system level redundancy by physically connecting both the ports on a single switch. I am unable to define both ports to be part of the same IP subnet. Is there any workaround for this.
> >
> > Kindly enlighten me
> >
> > With warm regards,
> > Vinod.
> >
>
-- Rich Sena - ras@thick.net ThickNET Consulting "On the way to understanding; you understand, and forget."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:31 EDT