in ngarch-req:
> There are two kinds of mobility; host mobility and
> network mobility. Host mobility is when an individual
> host moves from where it was to where it is. Network
> mobility is when an entire network (or subnetwork)
> moves.
> The architecture MUST support network level
> mobility.
does the absence of statement about requiring host mobility
indicate that this is not something the architecture should
be required to support?
i think the architecture should support both.
i am also curious, you state that the two are definitely two
different kinds of things. it seems to me that there may
be architectural abstractions in which 'user' mobility is a
special case of 'network' mobility. i think any future
architecture needs to support both, and if it can do so
through a common method, all the better.
a.
-- Mobile: +46 73 029 8019 Office: +46 920 49 3030http://www.bethepeople.com/vaccine_rides/events_vacc_eu.htm Rider: Avri Doria Rider #: 1338
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 04:10:04 EDT