[cisco-voip] Quick Question About 911 Policy - Please Respond -Quick Response
Kris Seraphine
baryonyx5 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 09:08:49 EST 2007
We ended up switch the access code to 8 to cut down on false dials but 20 to
30 911 calls a month for only 100 users seems extreme. Do you have anyone
using the dial from outlook plugin? I've had situations where a customer
deploys it and an employee configures dialing rules incorrectly causing a
bunch of 911 calls. You may also want to do a CDR search for 911 calls and
see if the bulk of them are coming from the same source.
On 3/30/07, Jerri Robbins <jrobbins at mercurypay.com> wrote:
>
> We were having similar problems with 911 calls with 9 as the access
> code. With only 100 employees we were experiencing between 20 and 30 911
> false calls a month. We switched to access code 8 about a year ago and have
> had 3 since then.
>
>
>
> *Jerri*
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Friday, March 30, 2007 7:17 AM
> *To:* Miller, Steve
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Quick Question About 911 Policy - Please
> Respond -Quick Response
>
>
>
> Illinois law says that anyone visiting the site should be able to pick up
> a phone (without knowing the access code) and get emergency assistance...
>
> To be honest, creating both patterns is just a good idea... (do you want
> to be responsible because you didn't?)
>
> However, I would recommend changing your access code to 7 or 8 to ensure
> you don't get a lot of misdialed 911 calls...
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 3/29/07, *Miller, Steve* <MillerS at dicksteinshapiro.com> wrote:
>
> We currently program our Call Manager to dial 911 as well as (9) 911. Is
> there anything legal that forces us to do so? We've had 100 false 911 calls
> over the past 3 months and I would like to restrict 911 and force everyone
> to call (9) 911 using the access code as they would for any other outside
> number. Opinions? Legal facts? Please let me know!
>
>
>
> Steve Miller
> Telecom Engineer
> Dickstein Shapiro LLP
> 1825 Eye Street NW | Washington, DC 20006
> Tel (202) 420-3370 Fax (202)-330-5607
> millers at dicksteinshapiro.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This e-mail message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you have received this communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this e-mail message and any attached files is strictly prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right to monitor any communication that is created, received, or sent on its network. If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail message and permanently delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
> To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to postmaster at dicksteinshapiro.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Dickstein Shapiro LLP
>
> http://www.DicksteinShapiro.com
>
> ==============================================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
kris seraphine
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070330/283c3abb/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list