[cisco-voip] Headset Lifter
Nate VanMaren
VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org
Thu Apr 15 13:29:00 EDT 2010
The phones with the optical hook switches (7942/7945) can use the wireless hook switch. Plantronics has one called APC-4, that you can use with your existing CS-50s.
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tkachuk,Birni
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:19 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Headset Lifter
We use the CS-50 headsets on our 7940's and our staff really like them. This enables them to move around and answer their phone from wherever they are. Nothing special is required for installation. We just discovered that there is a new GN Netcom Jabra Headset GN9350 - that uses an electronic lifter - so no hardware lifter on the set. We will have to upgrade our firmware to 8.3.3 as it does not work on 8.3.2. May only work for 7942 sets - haven't really investigated.
Birni Tkachuk
Network Services
Department of Information Services
P 780.471.7532 F 780.491.3083
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:00 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 78, Issue 16
Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3) without using
installer (Lelio Fulgenzi)
2. Re: See active calls on CUCM (Peter)
3. Re: Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3) without using
installer (Wes Sisk)
4. Re: Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3) without using
installer (Lelio Fulgenzi)
5. 7925G SCCP 1.3(3) some phones missing Personal/Corporate
Directory (Jason Aarons (US))
6. Re: Caller ID from FXO (Giles Woolston)
7. Re: Sync password change to CUPC (Ryan Ratliff)
8. Re: Sync password change to CUPC (Maciej Karpinski)
9. Re: Fishing For Suggestions (Ryan Ratliff)
10. Re: CCM 4.2 AD Integration (Ryan Ratliff)
11. Re: CUCM 7.1(3a) ATA Box rejected (Ryan Ratliff)
12. Re: suspected hardware failure (Peter Slow)
13. Re: Phone Designer The server encountered an Internal Error
(Ryan Ratliff)
14. 3640 and MFR (Jim Reed)
15. Re: CCM 4.1, CUBE and sip trunk (Ryan Ratliff)
16. Cisco 7910G-S/W (Bob Gibbons, Jr.)
17. Re: suspected hardware failure (Miller, Brinis)
18. Re: suspected hardware failure (Ryan Ratliff)
19. Re: suspected hardware failure (Miller, Brinis)
20. Re: Sync password change to CUPC (Joe Martini (joemar2))
21. Re: Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3) without using
installer (Ryan Ratliff)
22. Re: Cisco 7910G-S/W (Ryan Ratliff)
23. Re: suspected hardware failure (Ryan Ratliff)
24. Re: Sync password change to CUPC (Maciej Karpinski)
25. Re: Cisco 7910G-S/W (Biffle, Gerrad)
26. Re: suspected hardware failure (Miller, Brinis)
27. Re: Transcoding issue (Peter Slow)
28. Re: DISA in CCM 4.1 (Peter Slow)
29. Re: cisco docs on amazon kindle 2 (Peter Slow)
30. Re: Cisco 7910G-S/W (Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila)
31. Restart MOH Translator (Carter, Bill)
32. Re: 3640 and MFR (Scott Voll)
33. Video-on-hold in UCCX and UCCE (Philip Walenta)
34. NetPro Forum Login > Page Expired To protect privacy and
enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no longer
available. (Jason Aarons (US))
35. Re: NetPro Forum Login > Page Expired To protect privacy and
enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no longer
available. (Lelio Fulgenzi)
36. Re: cisco docs on amazon kindle 2 (Carter, Bill)
37. Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process (Carter, Bill)
38. Re: cisco docs on amazon kindle 2 (Nikola Stojsin)
39. Deleted a phone on accident (Haas, Neal)
40. OT: EIGRP question... (Lelio Fulgenzi)
41. Re: Deleted a phone on accident (Wes Sisk)
42. Re: Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process (Wes Sisk)
43. 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Ratko Dodevski)
44. Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID (Monica Hardy)
45. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Lelio Fulgenzi)
46. Re: Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID (Bill Talley)
47. Re: Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID (Bill Talley)
48. Re: DISA in CCM 4.1 (Bill Talley)
49. Re: Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process (Carter, Bill)
50. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Ratko Dodevski)
51. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Lelio Fulgenzi)
52. Re: Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process (Carter, Bill)
53. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Ratko Dodevski)
54. Re: Deleted a phone on accident (Cristobal Priego)
55. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Lelio Fulgenzi)
56. Re: Deleted a phone on accident (Lelio Fulgenzi)
57. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Matthew Ballard)
58. Re: Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID (Monica Hardy)
59. Re: How to send inbound call to multiple extensions (Tim Smith)
60. Re: Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID (Bill Talley)
61. Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling
party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1? (jeremy co)
62. Re: Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling
party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1? (lelio at uoguelph.ca)
63. Re: Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling
party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1? (jeremy co)
64. Re: Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling
party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1? (lelio at uoguelph.ca)
65. Brent Phone Issue beeps when key is turned
(kevin.hobson2000 at ntlworld.com)
66. Headsets and Lifters (David Zhars)
67. Convert MGCP to H323 (CCM4.1) (David Zhars)
68. Re: Headsets and Lifters (Lelio Fulgenzi)
69. Re: Headsets and Lifters (Matthew Loraditch)
70. Re: Convert MGCP to H323 (CCM4.1) (Dennis Heim)
71. Re: Translation Equivalent to *67 (Justin Steinberg)
72. Re: OT: EIGRP question... (Mike King)
73. Re: 2951 with 64 FXS ports (Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila)
74. SUB: Regd Unity 7.0 installation (venkata sashank)
75. Re: Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling
party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1? (Ted Nugent)
76. Re: Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process (Wes Sisk)
77. Re: Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID (Monica Hardy)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:06:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3)
without using installer
Message-ID:
<1174851113.3250801271261183635.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Typically, phone firmware files are included in a zip file so you can just copy them over to a 4.1(3) box.
When I look at 7925, it has two installers, one for 4.1 and earlier and one for 5 and later. It also has a TAR file for CME.
When I untar the CME file it has the same .LOADS and .SBN files that appear for earlier versions of the firmware on 4.1(3).
Can I just copy these files over to my TFTP server and I'm good to go?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/347c37ed/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:31:37 -0500
From: "Peter" <pl.voip at gmail.com>
To: "'Lelio Fulgenzi'" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "'Nate VanMaren'"
<VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
Message-ID: <4bc5edea.9753f10a.783d.1183 at mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Singlewire Software also has CallAware that does dialed number alerting (911 alerts). It works with the InformaCast product.
(Full disclosure: New list subscriber who's employment changed from a Cisco Partner's Professional Services to Singlewire Software).
Regards,
-Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:59 AM
To: Nate VanMaren
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
We're using Cistera's RapidBroadcast Application which also has the 911 alerting.
There are others out there that do something similar. Radianta comes to mind.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nate VanMaren" <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 11:53:55 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
Who?s app is this? We?re needing more features on top of CER, like monitoring and recording, possibly a little better alerting. (like showing a map with a blinking red circle where the caller is).
-Nate
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:07 AM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
The application we have uses CTI to monitor all phone calls to ensure 911 calls are alerted. It's quite slick. When you look at the logs of the application it has clear call starts and call ends. It shouldn't be hard for an application developer (not me) to monitor this information and post it to a web page.
BigBrother application name is already taken though. ;)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at cdw.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:55:34 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
Correct. CDR are only written when call ends. There is no standard interface to get a real time report of active calls including calling/called party. Ambitious people can parse it out of traces but that clearly has its own issues.
/Wes
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:55:13 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> <mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
Unless things have changed, CDRs only show "completed" calls. That's why you can't use CDR as a live 911 tool, only after the 911 call is completed.
You'll likely need a tool that controls the phones via CTI? For example, there are plenty of tools out there that monitor the phone and alert you to when a 911 call is placed. I wouldn't doubt there are some out there that are doing exactly what you want. Would probably be a pretty CPU intensive programm if you have plenty of phones.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at cdw.com> <mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com>
To: "Marcelo Zilio" <ziliomarcelo at gmail.com> <mailto:ziliomarcelo at gmail.com> , "Aman Chugh" <aman.chugh at gmail.com> <mailto:aman.chugh at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:48:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
You need a CDR package.. depending on what you want, you may need a 3rd party package.
Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN 46032
317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com
www.berbee.com <http://www.berbee.com/>
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marcelo Zilio
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:36 AM
To: Aman Chugh
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] See active calls on CUCM
Hi Aman,
Yes, I see that
But it is just as you said: a counter to see how many calls are active. It doesn't show who is calling who.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Aman Chugh <aman.chugh at gmail.com> wrote:
Have you looked at Perform counters in RTMT , There is an counter to tell you active calls on the system.
Regards,
Aman
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Marcelo Zilio <ziliomarcelo at gmail.com> wrote:
Ip phone to Ip phone direct.
You are correct, off net call I can see on the voice gw.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
are you troubleshooting Ip to IP phone or off net calls.
off net you could get some info from the VGW.
Scott
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Marcelo Zilio <ziliomarcelo at gmail.com> wrote:
OK, CDR is fine but online information could simplify and speed up troubleshooting sometimes...
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
CDR's are all you get.
Scott
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Marcelo Zilio <ziliomarcelo at gmail.com> wrote:
Is there any way to see the active calls on CUCM?
I need to see who is calling who.
thanks
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
________________________________
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:37:27 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3)
without using installer
Message-ID: <4BC5EF47.3010205 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
The installer may also load the device type into the database so you can
configure that model of phone and configure default phone load for that
model of phone.
If you already have the phone model available to add then you *may* be
safe just copying in the tftp loads, configuring that as the loadid, and
restarting TFTP.
Occasionally there are patches/updates to database fields in the
installers. If there is any database update and you do not run the
installer then you will be missing that update.
/Wes
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:06:23 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
<lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> Typically, phone firmware files are included in a zip file so you can
> just copy them over to a 4.1(3) box.
>
> When I look at 7925, it has two installers, one for 4.1 and earlier
> and one for 5 and later. It also has a TAR file for CME.
>
> When I untar the CME file it has the same .LOADS and .SBN files that
> appear for earlier versions of the firmware on 4.1(3).
>
> Can I just copy these files over to my TFTP server and I'm good to go?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/b534ae6c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:53:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3)
without using installer
Message-ID:
<583918992.3273941271264030643.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks Wes. I always thought it was the devpack that did the database updates.
I'll try copying the files over for now and see how it goes.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:37:27 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3) without using installer
The installer may also load the device type into the database so you can configure that model of phone and configure default phone load for that model of phone.
If you already have the phone model available to add then you *may* be safe just copying in the tftp loads, configuring that as the loadid, and restarting TFTP.
Occasionally there are patches/updates to database fields in the installers. If there is any database update and you do not run the installer then you will be missing that update.
/Wes
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:06:23 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
Typically, phone firmware files are included in a zip file so you can just copy them over to a 4.1(3) box.
When I look at 7925, it has two installers, one for 4.1 and earlier and one for 5 and later. It also has a TAR file for CME.
When I untar the CME file it has the same .LOADS and .SBN files that appear for earlier versions of the firmware on 4.1(3).
Can I just copy these files over to my TFTP server and I'm good to go?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/551e56b3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:28:41 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7925G SCCP 1.3(3) some phones missing
Personal/Corporate Directory
Message-ID:
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0B519E4F2F at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have 16 7925Gs running SCCP 1.3(3) under CallManager 7.1(3)SU2, from main screen hit up arrow to the open phone book (Directories). Some phones are missing Corporate Directory and Personal. I can't figure out why the difference between phones showing Corporate Directory and those not. It might be some 7925s were registered to CallManager Express 7 before?
Both show
AppLoad ID CP7925G-1.3.3.LOADS
Problem 7925G Phone directory shows
1. Missed calls
2. Received cals
3. Placed Calls
4. Phone Book
5. Speed Dials
Good 7925G Phone Directory shows
1. Missed calls
2. Received Calls
3. Placed Calls
4. Personal Directory
5. Corporate Directory
6. Phone Book
7. Speed Dials
Jason Aarons
Consultant
904-338-3245 Mobile
Dimension Data
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/850209f7/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:56:33 +1200
From: Giles Woolston <giles.woolston at paradise.net.nz>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID from FXO
Message-ID: <4BC601D1.8010508 at paradise.net.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Also, VIC-2FXO doesn't support caller-id afaik. The VIC2 modules and
VIC-2FXO-M1 do I believe.
On 13/04/2010 7:16 a.m., Ryan Ratliff wrote:
> I was thinking it was a 7.1.5 feature but I was wrong...
>
> http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/8_0_1/delta/cmadmin.html#wp1115153
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote:
>
>
>> It does in 8.0! :-)
>>
>> +Chris
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
>> (rratliff)
>> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:59 PM
>> To: David Zhars
>> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID from FXO
>>
>> CUCM currently doesn't support caller id on FXO ports controlled by
>> MGCP.
>>
>> Reference
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_tech_note0
>> 9186a008009428e.shtml
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 2:47 PM, David Zhars wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have a 2801 router with a dual port FXO card. In the first port is
>>>
>> the telephone # for the building. If this line is in use and someone
>> calls the #, it rolls to a second phone #, a DID on our ISDN line. The
>> router is in MGCP mode.
>>
>>> When someone calls in, if they get that first # and the FXO port, we
>>>
>> never get their caller ID.
>>
>>> If they should roll to the 2nd line (the DID) we always get the caller
>>>
>> ID.
>>
>>> Since this is not an overly busy building, most times they get the
>>>
>> POTS line in the FXO card and no Caller ID.
>>
>>> Anyway I can fix this? Here's the config of the FXO port:
>>>
>>> voice-port 0/0/0
>>> echo-cancel coverage 48
>>> timing hookflash-out 500
>>> connection plar 2000
>>> description XXX-YYY-ZZZZ
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5029 (20100414) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:11:25 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: Maciej Karpinski <maciej.karpinski at consign.se>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sync password change to CUPC
Message-ID: <707B89BA-D8AE-4FE6-8DCD-1F24A0BC6172 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
If you are using ldap authentication in CUCM then your CUPC passwords should be automatically synced up with AD.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Maciej Karpinski wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would need a solution to sync passwords from windows to CUPC.
>
> We use CUPC 7.1 and the users have their accounts for web conferrencing server and voice messaging server filled in ( Meetingplace express and Unity express ) all systems use AD login but if a user changes the AD login they must manually change their credentials in CUPC.
>
> It tere any way to have it updated automatically?
>
> /Maciej
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:17:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Maciej Karpinski <maciej.karpinski at consign.se>
To: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sync password change to CUPC
Message-ID:
<alpine.LFD.1.10.1004142011150.4769 at strangeland.kanalen.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Hi
Yes it is so the next time a user logs in he must use the new password but
the problem is that every user must change "voice messaging" and
"conferrencing server" passwords in their client manually in the
preferences menu.
If they check under help > server health they can see that they are not
connected to conferrencing server and voicemail server but they don't get
any message that the passwords are wrong, they just don't receive any
notifications about voicemails in CUPC and can not start anu conferrences
from the client.
So what we would want to have is something that triggers when the user
changes his AD password and populates the password for voicemail and
conferrencing in the CUPC.
/Maciej
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
> If you are using ldap authentication in CUCM then your CUPC passwords should be automatically synced up with AD.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Maciej Karpinski wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I would need a solution to sync passwords from windows to CUPC.
>>
>> We use CUPC 7.1 and the users have their accounts for web conferrencing server and voice messaging server filled in ( Meetingplace express and Unity express ) all systems use AD login but if a user changes the AD login they must manually change their credentials in CUPC.
>>
>> It tere any way to have it updated automatically?
>>
>> /Maciej
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:35:29 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fishing For Suggestions
Message-ID: <77ABABED-49AD-4335-BF3D-DBB6A516402E at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You can also set up a dummy CTI RP for each entity (assuming they each have their own DID) and forward calls into AC for each of them. On the receptionist's line(s) at the very bottom enable the display of forwarding information. Now she should see the number (possibly name, if you give it one) of the dummy CTI RP that forwarded the call into AC.
-Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Wes Sisk wrote:
> In IPCC you can do a screen pop to show the information or you can modify the call info for presentation to the agent.
>
> In AC there is service parameter to affect what number is presented to the client phone.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:12:32 AM, Jim Reed <jreed at swiftnews.com> wrote:
>> We have a location that is on Call Manager 4.2(3)sr4a and IPCC Enhanced 4.0(5). The receptionist uses a PC attendant console. A request has come across the help desk regarding having her answer calls for two (2) other entities. What suggestions might those of you out there in the ether have for different ways of identifying those inbound calls so the receptionist can give the correct greeting depending on the called number. Right now, all she sees on an inbound call is the inbound caller ID. Is there another element that can be displayed on the attendant console that will show her what the called number was and thus prompt her to use the correct greeting? I'm researching this myself but don't want to reinvent the wheel if there are already some great ideas out there for handling this.
>>
>> Thank You...
>> --
>> Jim Reed
>> Manager of Technical Services
>> aka Titan of Technology
>> aka Technology Wrangler
>> Swift Communications, Inc.
>> 970-243-2200 Ext. 12301
>> 775-772-7666 (Cell)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/f5cb2162/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:38:21 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: george.hendrix at l-3com.com
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 4.2 AD Integration
Message-ID: <408E13A4-2BDD-46D9-8925-63CCE2DD1749 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Just re-run the directory configuration plugin and choose the option to uninstall. This will change the configuration in CUCM to point back to DCD and set DCD back to automatic startup.
It will need to be done on all servers.
-Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at 9:27 AM, george.hendrix at l-3com.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a cluster that is integrated with the AD in the Unity server. I am trying to back out of this integration, but haven?t found much with regards to backing out of it and restoring the DC directory. Any info is appreciated, or a link to the procedures.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill Hendrix
> george.hendrix at l-3com.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/771b13aa/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:42:26 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: Robert Kulagowski <rkulagow at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 7.1(3a) ATA Box rejected
Message-ID: <AC597075-90E4-45A8-A441-C428FEE6E9B9 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
The issue was with the size of the configuration file and a 4k limit the ATAs had. Typically the ATA will fail to parse the file if it's too large, and just try to register with the configured TFTP server. If the TFTP server isn't in the CM group for the ATA this could cause the registration to get rejected.
The easiest way to try and workaround this is to create a device pool with a CM group with only a single server in it, and as minimal of a configuration as you can make it. This will hopefully drop the config file down below 4k and let the ATA upgrade to the newer load. At that point you can move it back to the normal device pool and it will be fine.
-Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Robert Kulagowski wrote:
>> we plan the upgrade of our Callmanager Cluster from 4.2(3) to 7.1(3a).
>> We have some ATA Boxes attached to the CallManager. We tried the upgrade in
>> our lab and found out, that most of the ATA Boxes updatetd itself fine.
>> However one Box appears as "Rejected" in the ccmadmin Device Pages. I did a
>> factory reset, but the ATA box is still rejected.
>>
>> Has anyone an idea why? Other ATA Boxes with the same HW typ are up and
>> running.
>
> Have you checked the archives of this list? I'm pretty sure that
> you'll see that there's an issue with the firmware of the ATA needing
> to be on 3.2.4 _before_ the upgrade to 7.1.3(a).
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:41:18 -0400
From: Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
To: "Miller, Brinis" <bmiller at chesco.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Message-ID:
<t2x53fc16d41004141141q191b033cgecbd15fcaf7c41d6 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
it is unlikely that a failing disk drive would be remedied or leave
its failing state from a reboot.
the HP Diagnostic utilities will let you run a report that shows you
error counters for the drives, i'd recommend looking at that if you're
concerned. if you were having perfrmance related issues, causing TCD
heartbeat issues (heartbeat < 24 bpm) you would likely also be seeing
things liek code yellows, phone unregistrations delayed dial-tone etc.
unfortunately, these symptoms are all possible with memory leaks and
high CPU utilization as well. if you _dont_ see any of those issues,
there's a higher chance it's something related specifically to TCD.
What i'd recommend is looking at the perfmon counter for TCD to see if
the heartbeat is "less than 24" bpm, or if it's 0 BPM. one indicates a
performance issue, the latter indicates your service is just hung.
-Peter
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Miller, Brinis <bmiller at chesco.org> wrote:
> Yes I have several good backups.
>
> I do have support.
>
>
>
> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> Do you have a good BARS backup?
>
> Is your server covered by a service contract?
>
>
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW? Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN? 46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
>
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
> From: Miller, Brinis [mailto:bmiller at chesco.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:09 AM
> To: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> Sorry for the lack of info, some people say I give too much. I suppose my
> question was a little Spartan.
>
> CCM 4.2(3)sr4b
>
> HP Proliant DL380 G4 server. W2000-4-6sr9 platform
>
> Yes, I know that both CTI and TCD are related to AC, but can be affected by
> the CallManager service not receiving enough cpu time.
>
> This can be caused by a slowing disk or failing array controller, I have
> read.
>
> The cpu and memory usage, now are normal as before the incident requiring
> the reboot. Spiking before the reboot.
>
> The CallManager service, set to automatic, had stopped and started a number
> of times.
>
> The server appears to be running normally now, but had caused a catastrophe.
>
> Please see attached file
>
> Please see link below. ?Read to very end.
>
> http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447626+1269279479813+28353475&threadId=180196
>
>
>
> Thank you for your reply
>
>
>
> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:19 PM
> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> TCD is related to Attendant Console. What is your cpu and memory utilization
> like? What version of ccm?
>
>
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW? Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN? 46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
>
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller, Brinis
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:54 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I?m a new comer to the net and would like to post a question.
>
>
>
> I have a MCS 7835 server which I believe has a hardware failure about to
> happen.
>
>
>
> I got a lot of the cpqcissm event 9 messages before it was rebooted. Since
> then none has reappeared.
>
> I also got
>
> Tcd Server heartbeat rate below 24 beats per minute.
>
> Current heartbeat rate is 0 beats per minute.
>
> ?I?m thinking I have a hard drive about to bite the dust, how can I test to
> isolate the cause?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> BMiller
>
>
>
>
>
> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is
> addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are
> hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone
> this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained
> in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this
> e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
> e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:47:48 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
Cc: "'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phone Designer The server encountered an
Internal Error
Message-ID: <BB614C2F-1E45-453D-B43A-EADB8CF75F68 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I believe someone had found a temp folder where Phone Designer stored files while it was pushing them to the phone for preview, etc. Unless I'm making it up it should be available in the archives of this list.
-Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Haas, Neal wrote:
> NO, not with the Phone Designer phone designer is a one to one app. You will need to upload the images (icon and image) to the tftp site. Stop and start the TFTP and you will have an image available for users to select. I tried and tried to see if I could do something to force this ? nope.
>
> There are some third party apps out there that can do it. I think they are around $100
>
> Neal Haas
>
> 1020 S 10th St
> Fresno, CA 93702
> Desk 559.600.5890
>
> From: Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:jason.aarons at us.didata.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:05 AM
> To: Haas, Neal; 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Phone Designer The server encountered an Internal Error
>
> Logging into Phone Designer as a end user works. I can update ring tone and wallpaper.
>
> Is there a way to set the default wallpaper for all users via Phone Designer.
>
> From: Haas, Neal [mailto:nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:42 AM
> To: Jason Aarons (US); 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Phone Designer The server encountered an Internal Error
>
> Try logging in a as a User that has a phone associated to the User name.
>
> Neal Haas
>
> 1020 S 10th St
> Fresno, CA 93702
> Desk 559.600.5890
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons (US)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 7:25 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Phone Designer The server encountered an Internal Error
>
> Running CallManager 7.1.3.32900-4 and playing with Phone Designer 7.1.3SR1.
>
> At startup I get Red X with ?The server encountered an Internal Error?.
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> <image001.jpg>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/a41729aa/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:45:52 -0600
From: Jim Reed <jreed at swiftnews.com>
To: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] 3640 and MFR
Message-ID: <C7EB6980.37EB7%jreed at swiftnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
While this does not necessarily involve VoIP -- although VoIP will run over
these circuits -- does anyone know what the minimum IOS file is that
supports MFR (multilink frame relay)? What I'm trying to say is does just
the basic IP image support MFR -- doesn't seem to. Or does it require IP
Plus. Or Enterprise. Or Enterprise Plus. Etc. Etc. Etc. The software
advisor tool on Cisco's website doesn't even list the 36xx series routers
any more. Although it does list the 26xx series routers. Any insight would
be greatly appreciated -- as always.
--
Jim Reed
Manager of Technical Services
aka Titan of Technology
aka Technology Wrangler
Swift Communications, Inc.
970-243-2200 Ext. 12301
775-772-7666 (Cell)
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:51:21 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM 4.1, CUBE and sip trunk
Message-ID: <1C76BA81-8B35-44F1-995D-F2DE71779E16 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
EoL doesn't mean not supported. In this case you've still got another year or more until the 4.x versions aren't supported by TAC (longer for 4.3).
-Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Nick Matthews wrote:
> I would not go so far as to categorize it as 'unrisky' or a 'sure
> thing'. CCM still has it's fair share of troubles when it comes with
> H.323 in CCM 4.1. To start, all calls will have to be G.711 and you
> will probably need MTP resources for all the calls as well.
>
> -nick
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Mirko Maffioli <mirkomaffioli at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you.
>> I have fear for some compatibility error on signaling and no support
>> from cisco TAC.
>> CCM 4.1 is EOL from a looooong time :)
>>
>> 2010/4/13 Nick Matthews <matthnick at gmail.com>:
>>> For CCM 4.1 I would do CCM--H323--CUBE--SIP, as you have suggested.
>>> It sounds like you're on the right track.
>>>
>>> -nick
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Mirko Maffioli <mirkomaffioli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I have to establish a sip trunk with a ccm 4.1 and a voice provider.
>>>> May i use a 2811 with cube license and a h323 trunk vs ccm?
>>>>
>>>> Any signaling problem by the old ccm version?
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>> Mirko
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 'ao
>> Guercio
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:18:59 -0400
From: "Bob Gibbons, Jr." <bgibbons at pendercountync.gov>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7910G-S/W
Message-ID: <516E74BB856748268351F278690D17DB at pendercounty.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Does anyone know if the Cisco IP Phone 7910G-S/W supported in Call Manager
7.X
Thanks,
Bob Gibbons, Jr.
Network Administrator
Pender County Government
910-259-1406
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Law "NCGS.Ch.132" and may be disclosed to third
parties."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/8940ce2f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:52:40 -0400
From: "Miller, Brinis" <bmiller at chesco.org>
To: "Peter Slow" <peter.slow at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Message-ID:
<C57378A14116F045931E03E0A0D1A7F5247B39 at PTMAIL02.ntds.chesco.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
At the time this was happening it had all the symptoms.
The CallManager with the IPCC coresident, which is also the TFTP server stalled, while the server with all the errors went slowly down.
I rebooted the TFTP CallManager with the IPCC and all its functionality came back.
Meanwhile the error server continued its downward spiral.
I do not want to relive that day again.
I have placed a TAC ticket maybe they can shed light on this.
B
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.slow at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:41 PM
To: Miller, Brinis
Cc: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
it is unlikely that a failing disk drive would be remedied or leave
its failing state from a reboot.
the HP Diagnostic utilities will let you run a report that shows you
error counters for the drives, i'd recommend looking at that if you're
concerned. if you were having perfrmance related issues, causing TCD
heartbeat issues (heartbeat < 24 bpm) you would likely also be seeing
things liek code yellows, phone unregistrations delayed dial-tone etc.
unfortunately, these symptoms are all possible with memory leaks and
high CPU utilization as well. if you _dont_ see any of those issues,
there's a higher chance it's something related specifically to TCD.
What i'd recommend is looking at the perfmon counter for TCD to see if
the heartbeat is "less than 24" bpm, or if it's 0 BPM. one indicates a
performance issue, the latter indicates your service is just hung.
-Peter
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Miller, Brinis <bmiller at chesco.org> wrote:
> Yes I have several good backups.
>
> I do have support.
>
>
>
> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> Do you have a good BARS backup?
>
> Is your server covered by a service contract?
>
>
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN 46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
>
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
> From: Miller, Brinis [mailto:bmiller at chesco.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:09 AM
> To: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> Sorry for the lack of info, some people say I give too much. I suppose my
> question was a little Spartan.
>
> CCM 4.2(3)sr4b
>
> HP Proliant DL380 G4 server. W2000-4-6sr9 platform
>
> Yes, I know that both CTI and TCD are related to AC, but can be affected by
> the CallManager service not receiving enough cpu time.
>
> This can be caused by a slowing disk or failing array controller, I have
> read.
>
> The cpu and memory usage, now are normal as before the incident requiring
> the reboot. Spiking before the reboot.
>
> The CallManager service, set to automatic, had stopped and started a number
> of times.
>
> The server appears to be running normally now, but had caused a catastrophe.
>
> Please see attached file
>
> Please see link below. Read to very end.
>
> http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447626+1269279479813+28353475&threadId=180196
>
>
>
> Thank you for your reply
>
>
>
> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:19 PM
> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> TCD is related to Attendant Console. What is your cpu and memory utilization
> like? What version of ccm?
>
>
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN 46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
>
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller, Brinis
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:54 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm a new comer to the net and would like to post a question.
>
>
>
> I have a MCS 7835 server which I believe has a hardware failure about to
> happen.
>
>
>
> I got a lot of the cpqcissm event 9 messages before it was rebooted. Since
> then none has reappeared.
>
> I also got
>
> Tcd Server heartbeat rate below 24 beats per minute.
>
> Current heartbeat rate is 0 beats per minute.
>
> I'm thinking I have a hard drive about to bite the dust, how can I test to
> isolate the cause?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> BMiller
>
>
>
>
>
> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is
> intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is
> addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
> addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are
> hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone
> this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained
> in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this
> e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
> e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:55:47 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Miller, Brinis" <bmiller at chesco.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Message-ID: <E939D694-97D2-46D9-9876-A2B066D061EC at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
How old is the server? If you've seen any errors related to the battery backup cache you need to have that replaced. The disk i/o performance drops through the floor when that battery dies and the cache gets disabled.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Miller, Brinis wrote:
> Yes I have several good backups.
> I do have support.
>
> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
> Do you have a good BARS backup?
> Is your server covered by a service contract?
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN 46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
> From: Miller, Brinis [mailto:bmiller at chesco.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:09 AM
> To: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
> Sorry for the lack of info, some people say I give too much. I suppose my question was a little Spartan.
> CCM 4.2(3)sr4b
> HP Proliant DL380 G4 server. W2000-4-6sr9 platform
> Yes, I know that both CTI and TCD are related to AC, but can be affected by the CallManager service not receiving enough cpu time.
> This can be caused by a slowing disk or failing array controller, I have read.
> The cpu and memory usage, now are normal as before the incident requiring the reboot. Spiking before the reboot.
> The CallManager service, set to automatic, had stopped and started a number of times.
> The server appears to be running normally now, but had caused a catastrophe.
> Please see attached file
> Please see link below. Read to very end.
> http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447626+1269279479813+28353475&threadId=180196
>
> Thank you for your reply
>
> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:19 PM
> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>
> TCD is related to Attendant Console. What is your cpu and memory utilization like? What version of ccm?
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN 46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller, Brinis
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:54 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>
> Hello,
>
> I?m a new comer to the net and would like to post a question.
>
> I have a MCS 7835 server which I believe has a hardware failure about to happen.
>
> I got a lot of the cpqcissm event 9 messages before it was rebooted. Since then none has reappeared.
> I also got
> Tcd Server heartbeat rate below 24 beats per minute.
> Current heartbeat rate is 0 beats per minute.
> I?m thinking I have a hard drive about to bite the dust, how can I test to isolate the cause?
>
> Regards,
> BMiller
>
>
> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/b049ad1c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:55:56 -0400
From: "Miller, Brinis" <bmiller at chesco.org>
To: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Message-ID:
<C57378A14116F045931E03E0A0D1A7F5247B3A at PTMAIL02.ntds.chesco.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The servers are not quite 4 years old.
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:56 PM
To: Miller, Brinis
Cc: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
How old is the server? If you've seen any errors related to the battery
backup cache you need to have that replaced. The disk i/o performance
drops through the floor when that battery dies and the cache gets
disabled.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Miller, Brinis wrote:
Yes I have several good backups.
I do have support.
From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
Do you have a good BARS backup?
Is your server covered by a service contract?
Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN 46032
317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com
www.berbee.com <http://www.berbee.com/>
From: Miller, Brinis [mailto:bmiller at chesco.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:09 AM
To: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
Sorry for the lack of info, some people say I give too much. I suppose
my question was a little Spartan.
CCM 4.2(3)sr4b
HP Proliant DL380 G4 server. W2000-4-6sr9 platform
Yes, I know that both CTI and TCD are related to AC, but can be affected
by the CallManager service not receiving enough cpu time.
This can be caused by a slowing disk or failing array controller, I have
read.
The cpu and memory usage, now are normal as before the incident
requiring the reboot. Spiking before the reboot.
The CallManager service, set to automatic, had stopped and started a
number of times.
The server appears to be running normally now, but had caused a
catastrophe.
Please see attached file
Please see link below. Read to very end.
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=10944
7626+1269279479813+28353475&threadId=180196
Thank you for your reply
From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:19 PM
To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
TCD is related to Attendant Console. What is your cpu and memory
utilization like? What version of ccm?
Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN 46032
317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com
www.berbee.com <http://www.berbee.com/>
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller, Brinis
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:54 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Hello,
I'm a new comer to the net and would like to post a question.
I have a MCS 7835 server which I believe has a hardware failure about to
happen.
I got a lot of the cpqcissm event 9 messages before it was rebooted.
Since then none has reappeared.
I also got
Tcd Server heartbeat rate below 24 beats per minute.
Current heartbeat rate is 0 beats per minute.
I'm thinking I have a hard drive about to bite the dust, how can I test
to isolate the cause?
Regards,
BMiller
This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is
intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are
not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose
or distribute to anyone this e-mail message including any attachments,
or any information contained in this e-mail message including any
attachments. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please
immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.
Thank you very much.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/1b01ed3c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:57:35 -0500
From: "Joe Martini (joemar2)" <joemar2 at cisco.com>
To: "Maciej Karpinski" <maciej.karpinski at consign.se>, "Ryan Ratliff
(rratliff)" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sync password change to CUPC
Message-ID:
<A50808205D76B94281544D469ADB8DB9019A92A6 at XMB-RCD-106.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
That feature isn't available. You have to manually go in and change the
voice mail and conferencing passwords on CUPC.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Maciej
Karpinski
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:17 PM
To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sync password change to CUPC
Hi
Yes it is so the next time a user logs in he must use the new password
but the problem is that every user must change "voice messaging" and
"conferrencing server" passwords in their client manually in the
preferences menu.
If they check under help > server health they can see that they are not
connected to conferrencing server and voicemail server but they don't
get any message that the passwords are wrong, they just don't receive
any notifications about voicemails in CUPC and can not start anu
conferrences from the client.
So what we would want to have is something that triggers when the user
changes his AD password and populates the password for voicemail and
conferrencing in the CUPC.
/Maciej
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
> If you are using ldap authentication in CUCM then your CUPC passwords
should be automatically synced up with AD.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Maciej Karpinski wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I would need a solution to sync passwords from windows to CUPC.
>>
>> We use CUPC 7.1 and the users have their accounts for web
conferrencing server and voice messaging server filled in ( Meetingplace
express and Unity express ) all systems use AD login but if a user
changes the AD login they must manually change their credentials in
CUPC.
>>
>> It tere any way to have it updated automatically?
>>
>> /Maciej
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:02:13 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3)
without using installer
Message-ID: <D89ACC18-EBB1-4694-B51E-6BD601820ACB at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Typically it is device packs that do the db stuff. I wouldn't put it past some teams to sneak updates into a load install however. At the least the installer will set device defaults and bounce TFTP for you.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Thanks Wes. I always thought it was the devpack that did the database updates.
>
> I'll try copying the files over for now and see how it goes.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:37:27 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Copying 7925 Firmware files to CCM 4.1(3) without using installer
>
> The installer may also load the device type into the database so you can configure that model of phone and configure default phone load for that model of phone.
>
> If you already have the phone model available to add then you *may* be safe just copying in the tftp loads, configuring that as the loadid, and restarting TFTP.
>
> Occasionally there are patches/updates to database fields in the installers. If there is any database update and you do not run the installer then you will be missing that update.
>
> /Wes
>
> On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:06:23 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> Typically, phone firmware files are included in a zip file so you can just copy them over to a 4.1(3) box.
>
> When I look at 7925, it has two installers, one for 4.1 and earlier and one for 5 and later. It also has a TAR file for CME.
>
> When I untar the CME file it has the same .LOADS and .SBN files that appear for earlier versions of the firmware on 4.1(3).
>
> Can I just copy these files over to my TFTP server and I'm good to go?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/ecb52512/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:10:39 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Bob Gibbons, Jr." <bgibbons at pendercountync.gov>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7910G-S/W
Message-ID: <933F1C49-7372-488F-80AF-65EC5D4BC2DC at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Certainly is. You can technically still register a VIP phone to CUCM 7, though why you'd want to is beyond me.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Bob Gibbons, Jr. wrote:
> Does anyone know if the Cisco IP Phone 7910G-S/W supported in Call Manager 7.X
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob Gibbons, Jr.
> Network Administrator
> Pender County Government
> 910-259-1406
>
> "E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law "NCGS.Ch.132" and may be disclosed to third parties."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/8024f295/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:12:10 -0400
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Miller, Brinis" <bmiller at chesco.org>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Message-ID: <AA146541-7F2E-4F0D-992C-B7A97E80458F at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Have you looked at the HP Integrated Management Log? You may need to download and install the app to read it but if you see any errors in there related to disks, etc you need to get those addressed.
Depending on your CUCM version nonpaged pool memory leaks can also present with very odd performance-like issues and would be cleared by a reboot.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Miller, Brinis wrote:
> At the time this was happening it had all the symptoms.
> The CallManager with the IPCC coresident, which is also the TFTP server stalled, while the server with all the errors went slowly down.
> I rebooted the TFTP CallManager with the IPCC and all its functionality came back.
> Meanwhile the error server continued its downward spiral.
> I do not want to relive that day again.
> I have placed a TAC ticket maybe they can shed light on this.
>
> B
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.slow at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:41 PM
> To: Miller, Brinis
> Cc: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>
> it is unlikely that a failing disk drive would be remedied or leave
> its failing state from a reboot.
> the HP Diagnostic utilities will let you run a report that shows you
> error counters for the drives, i'd recommend looking at that if you're
> concerned. if you were having perfrmance related issues, causing TCD
> heartbeat issues (heartbeat < 24 bpm) you would likely also be seeing
> things liek code yellows, phone unregistrations delayed dial-tone etc.
> unfortunately, these symptoms are all possible with memory leaks and
> high CPU utilization as well. if you _dont_ see any of those issues,
> there's a higher chance it's something related specifically to TCD.
>
> What i'd recommend is looking at the perfmon counter for TCD to see if
> the heartbeat is "less than 24" bpm, or if it's 0 BPM. one indicates a
> performance issue, the latter indicates your service is just hung.
>
> -Peter
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Miller, Brinis <bmiller at chesco.org> wrote:
>> Yes I have several good backups.
>>
>> I do have support.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
>> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you have a good BARS backup?
>>
>> Is your server covered by a service contract?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dennis Heim
>> Network Voice Engineer
>> CDW Advanced Technology Services
>> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
>> Carmel, IN 46032
>>
>> 317.569.4255 Office
>> 317.569.4201 Fax
>> 317.694.6070 Cell
>>
>> dennis.heim at cdw.com
>> www.berbee.com
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Miller, Brinis [mailto:bmiller at chesco.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:09 AM
>> To: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the lack of info, some people say I give too much. I suppose my
>> question was a little Spartan.
>>
>> CCM 4.2(3)sr4b
>>
>> HP Proliant DL380 G4 server. W2000-4-6sr9 platform
>>
>> Yes, I know that both CTI and TCD are related to AC, but can be affected by
>> the CallManager service not receiving enough cpu time.
>>
>> This can be caused by a slowing disk or failing array controller, I have
>> read.
>>
>> The cpu and memory usage, now are normal as before the incident requiring
>> the reboot. Spiking before the reboot.
>>
>> The CallManager service, set to automatic, had stopped and started a number
>> of times.
>>
>> The server appears to be running normally now, but had caused a catastrophe.
>>
>> Please see attached file
>>
>> Please see link below. Read to very end.
>>
>> http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447626+1269279479813+28353475&threadId=180196
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your reply
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:19 PM
>> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> TCD is related to Attendant Console. What is your cpu and memory utilization
>> like? What version of ccm?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dennis Heim
>> Network Voice Engineer
>> CDW Advanced Technology Services
>> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
>> Carmel, IN 46032
>>
>> 317.569.4255 Office
>> 317.569.4201 Fax
>> 317.694.6070 Cell
>>
>> dennis.heim at cdw.com
>> www.berbee.com
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller, Brinis
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:54 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm a new comer to the net and would like to post a question.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a MCS 7835 server which I believe has a hardware failure about to
>> happen.
>>
>>
>>
>> I got a lot of the cpqcissm event 9 messages before it was rebooted. Since
>> then none has reappeared.
>>
>> I also got
>>
>> Tcd Server heartbeat rate below 24 beats per minute.
>>
>> Current heartbeat rate is 0 beats per minute.
>>
>> I'm thinking I have a hard drive about to bite the dust, how can I test to
>> isolate the cause?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> BMiller
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is
>> intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is
>> addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
>> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
>> addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are
>> hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone
>> this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained
>> in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this
>> e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
>> e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information contained in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:10:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Maciej Karpinski <maciej.karpinski at consign.se>
To: "Joe Martini (joemar2)" <joemar2 at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sync password change to CUPC
Message-ID:
<alpine.LFD.1.10.1004142108540.4769 at strangeland.kanalen.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Yes but I hope that someone knows about any 3rd party software that could
solve this.
/Maciej
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Joe Martini (joemar2) wrote:
> That feature isn't available. You have to manually go in and change the
> voice mail and conferencing passwords on CUPC.
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Maciej
> Karpinski
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:17 PM
> To: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sync password change to CUPC
>
> Hi
>
> Yes it is so the next time a user logs in he must use the new password
> but the problem is that every user must change "voice messaging" and
> "conferrencing server" passwords in their client manually in the
> preferences menu.
> If they check under help > server health they can see that they are not
> connected to conferrencing server and voicemail server but they don't
> get any message that the passwords are wrong, they just don't receive
> any notifications about voicemails in CUPC and can not start anu
> conferrences from the client.
>
> So what we would want to have is something that triggers when the user
> changes his AD password and populates the password for voicemail and
> conferrencing in the CUPC.
>
> /Maciej
>
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Ryan Ratliff wrote:
>
>> If you are using ldap authentication in CUCM then your CUPC passwords
> should be automatically synced up with AD.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Maciej Karpinski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I would need a solution to sync passwords from windows to CUPC.
>>>
>>> We use CUPC 7.1 and the users have their accounts for web
> conferrencing server and voice messaging server filled in ( Meetingplace
> express and Unity express ) all systems use AD login but if a user
> changes the AD login they must manually change their credentials in
> CUPC.
>>>
>>> It tere any way to have it updated automatically?
>>>
>>> /Maciej
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:13:16 -0400
From: "Biffle, Gerrad" <Gerrad.Biffle at greensboro-nc.gov>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7910G-S/W
Message-ID:
<20FBBCDA26E1524C8EADDEA77FBAE69F2D9B42DC45 at EUROPA.greensboronc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey neighbor! We have over 300 of them running on 7.1.3.
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bob Gibbons, Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:19 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7910G-S/W
Does anyone know if the Cisco IP Phone 7910G-S/W supported in Call Manager 7.X
Thanks,
Bob Gibbons, Jr.
Network Administrator
Pender County Government
910-259-1406
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law "NCGS.Ch.132" and may be disclosed to third parties."
=======================================================
Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject
to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/7280bdae/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 26
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:21:31 -0400
From: "Miller, Brinis" <bmiller at chesco.org>
To: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Message-ID:
<C57378A14116F045931E03E0A0D1A7F5247B3B at PTMAIL02.ntds.chesco.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The array controller says the battery is ok, everything I see has a
green check.
For something to fail as miserably as this did, you would think
something would show up in the HP System Management
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:12 PM
To: Miller, Brinis
Cc: Peter Slow; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
Have you looked at the HP Integrated Management Log? You may need to
download and install the app to read it but if you see any errors in
there related to disks, etc you need to get those addressed.
Depending on your CUCM version nonpaged pool memory leaks can also
present with very odd performance-like issues and would be cleared by a
reboot.
-Ryan
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Miller, Brinis wrote:
> At the time this was happening it had all the symptoms.
> The CallManager with the IPCC coresident, which is also the TFTP
server stalled, while the server with all the errors went slowly down.
> I rebooted the TFTP CallManager with the IPCC and all its
functionality came back.
> Meanwhile the error server continued its downward spiral.
> I do not want to relive that day again.
> I have placed a TAC ticket maybe they can shed light on this.
>
> B
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Slow [mailto:peter.slow at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:41 PM
> To: Miller, Brinis
> Cc: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>
> it is unlikely that a failing disk drive would be remedied or leave
> its failing state from a reboot.
> the HP Diagnostic utilities will let you run a report that shows you
> error counters for the drives, i'd recommend looking at that if you're
> concerned. if you were having perfrmance related issues, causing TCD
> heartbeat issues (heartbeat < 24 bpm) you would likely also be seeing
> things liek code yellows, phone unregistrations delayed dial-tone etc.
> unfortunately, these symptoms are all possible with memory leaks and
> high CPU utilization as well. if you _dont_ see any of those issues,
> there's a higher chance it's something related specifically to TCD.
>
> What i'd recommend is looking at the perfmon counter for TCD to see if
> the heartbeat is "less than 24" bpm, or if it's 0 BPM. one indicates a
> performance issue, the latter indicates your service is just hung.
>
> -Peter
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Miller, Brinis <bmiller at chesco.org>
wrote:
>> Yes I have several good backups.
>>
>> I do have support.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:12 AM
>> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Do you have a good BARS backup?
>>
>> Is your server covered by a service contract?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dennis Heim
>> Network Voice Engineer
>> CDW Advanced Technology Services
>> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
>> Carmel, IN 46032
>>
>> 317.569.4255 Office
>> 317.569.4201 Fax
>> 317.694.6070 Cell
>>
>> dennis.heim at cdw.com
>> www.berbee.com
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Miller, Brinis [mailto:bmiller at chesco.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:09 AM
>> To: Dennis Heim; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the lack of info, some people say I give too much. I
suppose my
>> question was a little Spartan.
>>
>> CCM 4.2(3)sr4b
>>
>> HP Proliant DL380 G4 server. W2000-4-6sr9 platform
>>
>> Yes, I know that both CTI and TCD are related to AC, but can be
affected by
>> the CallManager service not receiving enough cpu time.
>>
>> This can be caused by a slowing disk or failing array controller, I
have
>> read.
>>
>> The cpu and memory usage, now are normal as before the incident
requiring
>> the reboot. Spiking before the reboot.
>>
>> The CallManager service, set to automatic, had stopped and started a
number
>> of times.
>>
>> The server appears to be running normally now, but had caused a
catastrophe.
>>
>> Please see attached file
>>
>> Please see link below. Read to very end.
>>
>>
http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=10944
7626+1269279479813+28353475&threadId=180196
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your reply
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dennis Heim [mailto:Dennis.Heim at cdw.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:19 PM
>> To: Miller, Brinis; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: RE: suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> TCD is related to Attendant Console. What is your cpu and memory
utilization
>> like? What version of ccm?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dennis Heim
>> Network Voice Engineer
>> CDW Advanced Technology Services
>> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
>> Carmel, IN 46032
>>
>> 317.569.4255 Office
>> 317.569.4201 Fax
>> 317.694.6070 Cell
>>
>> dennis.heim at cdw.com
>> www.berbee.com
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Miller,
Brinis
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:54 PM
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] suspected hardware failure
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm a new comer to the net and would like to post a question.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a MCS 7835 server which I believe has a hardware failure about
to
>> happen.
>>
>>
>>
>> I got a lot of the cpqcissm event 9 messages before it was rebooted.
Since
>> then none has reappeared.
>>
>> I also got
>>
>> Tcd Server heartbeat rate below 24 beats per minute.
>>
>> Current heartbeat rate is 0 beats per minute.
>>
>> I'm thinking I have a hard drive about to bite the dust, how can I
test to
>> isolate the cause?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> BMiller
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is
>> intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to
whom it is
>> addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and
>> exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intended
>> addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you
are
>> hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to
anyone
>> this e-mail message including any attachments, or any information
contained
>> in this e-mail message including any attachments. If you have
received this
>> e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender by
reply
>> e-mail and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
> This County of Chester e-mail message, including any attachments, is
intended for the sole use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are
not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended
addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose
or distribute to anyone this e-mail message including any attachments,
or any information contained in this e-mail message including any
attachments. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please
immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.
Thank you very much.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 27
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:40:45 -0400
From: Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" <chrward at cisco.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck-nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding issue
Message-ID:
<y2y53fc16d41004141240v29008defjb19b0fa6f7969b83 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Tim,
Did you ever figure this out?
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Chris Ward (chrward) <chrward at cisco.com>wrote:
> Tim,
>
>
>
> In this type of situation, I always like to put a device like a PC or
> anything with ping capabilities in one of the voice vlans from the call flow
> and then ping to a phone at the opposite end of the call flow. This will
> ensure that IP connectivity (routing) is working.
>
>
>
> You probably aren?t using a transcoder for an IP Phone to IP Phone call.
> Regardless of them being on different cluster unless there is DTMF mismatch
> or fast start being used. You can check by setting up the call with no audio
> and then checking the IP Phone web pages to see where the streams are being
> sent. That will show use where other potential issues may lie.
>
>
>
> +Chris
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *H, Tim
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:20 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Transcoding issue
>
>
>
> I have a remote site on a separate CUCM cluster than another remote site.
> They can dial each other and the call will connect, but they then cannot
> hear each other.
>
>
>
> I have other sites on the same CUCM cluster and can talk to the other
> remote sites with no issues.
>
>
>
> I have a feeling it?s a transcoding issue. Any other ideas?
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tim ***
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/25b3ba23/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 21602 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/25b3ba23/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 28
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:43:11 -0400
From: Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
To: Tim Foo <kinusca at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DISA in CCM 4.1
Message-ID:
<y2k53fc16d41004141243qcdcf4244s3008ae70b4b257f at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Tim,
Look at Mobile Voice Access.
http://www1.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/mobilapp.html#wp1043819
"Mobile Voice Access (also referred to as System Remote Access) and
Enterprise Feature Access two-stage dialing are features built on top
of the Mobile Connect application. Both features allow a
mobility-enabled user who is outside the enterprise to make a call as
though they are directly connected to Unified CM. This functionality
is commonly referred to as Direct Inward System Access (DISA) in
traditional telephony environments."
-peter
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Tim Foo <kinusca at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am asked to replicate the?DISA feature in PBX world in CCM 4.1.
>
> We have MGCP gateway. We are having other group companies which are
> connected to TIE lines and are accessible using some specific access code.
>
> So the user wants to be able to call-in and then get a second dial tone and
> be able to call any other group companies which are connected to a trunk or
> maybe able to call outside.
>
> Can you please send me the pointers to the configuration.
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 29
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:53:35 -0400
From: Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
To: Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
Message-ID:
<l2v53fc16d41004141253l5134f88dt17060522bcdd5160 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
I bought a kindle dx to read the SRND with while i was studying for my
IE. I wound up doing a lot of reading with it. it works okay, but you
are going to wind up doing one of two things:
reading the PDF version , and losing the ToC and link functionality
OR
sucking the web page into an ebook format and reading that, and losing
all the pretty diagrams and pictures in the SRND.
I keep each SRND/Guide in both formats on my kindle. Lately i've
realized that pretty much every cisco press book ever is available on
the kindle store, and it makes me sad i didnt ahve one sooner. My
kindle did a good job of letting me study without lugging a 1000 page
binder or my laptop around with me
-Pete
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone tried the barnes and noble e-reader for this purpose? been
> thinking about this myself, i like the way the nook is built better
> than the kindle.
>
> trying to resist the ipad...
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> :)
>> Ipad does not bring me extra functions rather than my netbook, i guess. Plus
>> kindle is $260, ipad is $500 :)
>>
>> ---
>> Dew Swen
>> CCVP, CCNP
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Tim Smith <thsglobal at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> What about Ipad? :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tim.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Jeff,
>>>>
>>>> That's the answer what I am looking for ;) Reading in my netbook is the
>>>> best choice now for mobility, I guess.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -
>>>> Dew Swen
>>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeff Spronk (jespronk)
>>>> <jespronk at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Dew,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you?re looking to buy a Kindle for Cisco docs, get the DX.? The
>>>>> regular kindle does not render Cisco PDFs correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, even with the DX, the font in the Cisco PDFs is a bit small unless
>>>>> you rotate the screen to landscape mode.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dew Swen
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 7:20 AM
>>>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone uses? How does it like? Does it worth to buy a kindle just for
>>>>> cisco docs & pdfs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> -
>>>>> Dew Swen
>>>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
------------------------------
Message: 30
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:13:22 -0400
From: "Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila" <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>
To: "Bob Gibbons, Jr." <bgibbons at pendercountync.gov>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7910G-S/W
Message-ID:
<38192AC07454A04196E4E021D411F918149DD3959D at exch.Netxar.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Yes.
Jorge Rodriguez
Senior Voice/Data Consultant
Netxar Technologies
PCS 7876888530
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com<mailto:jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>
[cid:image001.png at 01CADBE5.06153F90]
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bob Gibbons, Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:19 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco 7910G-S/W
Does anyone know if the Cisco IP Phone 7910G-S/W supported in Call Manager 7.X
Thanks,
Bob Gibbons, Jr.
Network Administrator
Pender County Government
910-259-1406
"E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law "NCGS.Ch.132" and may be disclosed to third parties."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/39d945c1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6292 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/39d945c1/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 31
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:33:49 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Restart MOH Translator
Message-ID:
<C0B4574561D1E04DBB500BA062BAF22601B1103F at Mail1.sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
How do I restart the MOH Audio Translator on CM 6.X/7.X. I have uploaded
a new MOH file to a CallManager and it says "Opening /mohprep/newmoh".
The status has been the same for 30 minutes. The file is 1.5mb.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/6e93ee96/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 32
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:49:44 -0700
From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
To: Jim Reed <jreed at swiftnews.com>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3640 and MFR
Message-ID:
<t2lf84a38d31004141349kfb952b4esb34339ae18901d6a at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
it's been a long time..... but if memory serves... I think you need IP Plus.
Scott
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jim Reed <jreed at swiftnews.com> wrote:
> While this does not necessarily involve VoIP -- although VoIP will run over
> these circuits -- does anyone know what the minimum IOS file is that
> supports MFR (multilink frame relay)? What I'm trying to say is does just
> the basic IP image support MFR -- doesn't seem to. Or does it require IP
> Plus. Or Enterprise. Or Enterprise Plus. Etc. Etc. Etc. The software
> advisor tool on Cisco's website doesn't even list the 36xx series routers
> any more. Although it does list the 26xx series routers. Any insight
> would
> be greatly appreciated -- as always.
> --
> Jim Reed
> Manager of Technical Services
> aka Titan of Technology
> aka Technology Wrangler
> Swift Communications, Inc.
> 970-243-2200 Ext. 12301
> 775-772-7666 (Cell)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/551812ca/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 33
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:56:19 -0500
From: "Philip Walenta" <pwalenta at wi.rr.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Video-on-hold in UCCX and UCCE
Message-ID: <013001cadc14$eed8c240$cc8a46c0$@rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I know UCCE supports video on hold while a caller is in queue.
Does anyone on this list know if video-on-hold is supported in UCCX yet?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/e73477f7/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 34
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:10:22 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: "web-help at cisco.com" <web-help at cisco.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] NetPro Forum Login > Page Expired To protect
privacy and enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no
longer available.
Message-ID:
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0B51A52B66 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I get onto NetPro forum hit login at top so I can post and get ;
Page Expired
To protect privacy and enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no longer available.
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/ca898953/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 35
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Cc: web-help at cisco.com, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] NetPro Forum Login > Page Expired To protect
privacy and enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no
longer available.
Message-ID:
<1781520963.3413051271279685470.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
i can log in fine.
www.cisco.com/go/netpro > login > enter credentials > voila
that being said, after logging in, i clicked the back button and got what you saw.
logged out, logged in again, clicked back button, and couldn't reproduce it.
weird.
FF 3.0.18
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
To: web-help at cisco.com
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:10:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] NetPro Forum Login > Page Expired To protect privacy and enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no longer available.
I get onto NetPro forum hit login at top so I can post and get ;
Page Expired
To protect privacy and enhance security, the page you are trying to access is no longer available.
Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/db1c43d4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 36
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:21:46 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
To: "Peter Slow" <peter.slow at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
Message-ID: <DFB206BD-3353-4B55-BAC0-824A7B24D362 at sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset="utf-8"
I have the Kindle iPhone app. Anyone know if it is possible to get
PDFs on this?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:53 PM, "Peter Slow" <peter.slow at gmail.com> wrote:
> I bought a kindle dx to read the SRND with while i was studying for my
> IE. I wound up doing a lot of reading with it. it works okay, but you
> are going to wind up doing one of two things:
>
> reading the PDF version , and losing the ToC and link functionality
> OR
> sucking the web page into an ebook format and reading that, and losing
> all the pretty diagrams and pictures in the SRND.
>
> I keep each SRND/Guide in both formats on my kindle. Lately i've
> realized that pretty much every cisco press book ever is available on
> the kindle store, and it makes me sad i didnt ahve one sooner. My
> kindle did a good job of letting me study without lugging a 1000 page
> binder or my laptop around with me
>
> -Pete
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Ed Leatherman
> <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyone tried the barnes and noble e-reader for this purpose? been
>> thinking about this myself, i like the way the nook is built better
>> than the kindle.
>>
>> trying to resist the ipad...
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> :)
>>> Ipad does not bring me extra functions rather than my netbook, i
>>> guess. Plus
>>> kindle is $260, ipad is $500 :)
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Dew Swen
>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Tim Smith <thsglobal at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What about Ipad? :)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Tim.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jeff,
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the answer what I am looking for ;) Reading in my netbook
>>>>> is the
>>>>> best choice now for mobility, I guess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> -
>>>>> Dew Swen
>>>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeff Spronk (jespronk)
>>>>> <jespronk at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Dew,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you?re looking to buy a Kindle for Cisco docs, get the
>>>>>> DX. The
>>>>>> regular kindle does not render Cisco PDFs correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, even with the DX, the font in the Cisco PDFs is a bit
>>>>>> small unless
>>>>>> you rotate the screen to landscape mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dew Swen
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 7:20 AM
>>>>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone uses? How does it like? Does it worth to buy a kindle
>>>>>> just for
>>>>>> cisco docs & pdfs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> Dew Swen
>>>>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Leatherman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 37
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:28:19 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
To: "Cisco-Voip-Puck" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process
Message-ID: <131B131E-4C87-4E5A-A6B6-162BB3AE0941 at sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset="us-ascii"
I have 2 7825-I callmanagers. From cli show status shows CPU idle at
about 45%. Through rtmt I see slp_svr process uses about 50% of the
CPU. I think slp_svr relates to IBM mgmt tools. Anyone else seen this?
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------
Message: 38
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:38:49 -0400
From: Nikola Stojsin <nikolas at networkmakers.com>
To: "'Carter, Bill'" <bcarter at sentinel.com>, "'Peter Slow'"
<peter.slow at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
Message-ID: <006001cadc1a$e0605330$a120f990$@net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
It is (I have Kindle app for my Blackberry Storm, and they should be the same). You are not likely to enjoy reading on the screen that small, though.
Nikola
P. S.: For what is worth, I have been using Kindles (2 and DX) since they came out and love them.
-------------------------------------------
Nikola Stojsin
PhD CCIE #12888
President
Network Makers LLC
110 Wall Street, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10005
(212) 709-8201
(212) 706-2986 (fax)
nikolas at networkmakers.com
-------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Carter, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:22 PM
To: Peter Slow
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
I have the Kindle iPhone app. Anyone know if it is possible to get
PDFs on this?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:53 PM, "Peter Slow" <peter.slow at gmail.com> wrote:
> I bought a kindle dx to read the SRND with while i was studying for my
> IE. I wound up doing a lot of reading with it. it works okay, but you
> are going to wind up doing one of two things:
>
> reading the PDF version , and losing the ToC and link functionality
> OR
> sucking the web page into an ebook format and reading that, and losing
> all the pretty diagrams and pictures in the SRND.
>
> I keep each SRND/Guide in both formats on my kindle. Lately i've
> realized that pretty much every cisco press book ever is available on
> the kindle store, and it makes me sad i didnt ahve one sooner. My
> kindle did a good job of letting me study without lugging a 1000 page
> binder or my laptop around with me
>
> -Pete
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Ed Leatherman
> <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyone tried the barnes and noble e-reader for this purpose? been
>> thinking about this myself, i like the way the nook is built better
>> than the kindle.
>>
>> trying to resist the ipad...
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> :)
>>> Ipad does not bring me extra functions rather than my netbook, i
>>> guess. Plus
>>> kindle is $260, ipad is $500 :)
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Dew Swen
>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Tim Smith <thsglobal at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What about Ipad? :)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Tim.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Dew Swen <dew.swen at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Jeff,
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the answer what I am looking for ;) Reading in my netbook
>>>>> is the
>>>>> best choice now for mobility, I guess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> -
>>>>> Dew Swen
>>>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Jeff Spronk (jespronk)
>>>>> <jespronk at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Dew,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you?re looking to buy a Kindle for Cisco docs, get the
>>>>>> DX. The
>>>>>> regular kindle does not render Cisco PDFs correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, even with the DX, the font in the Cisco PDFs is a bit
>>>>>> small unless
>>>>>> you rotate the screen to landscape mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dew Swen
>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2010 7:20 AM
>>>>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] cisco docs on amazon kindle 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone uses? How does it like? Does it worth to buy a kindle
>>>>>> just for
>>>>>> cisco docs & pdfs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> Dew Swen
>>>>>> CCVP, CCNP
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Leatherman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 39
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:39:31 -0700
From: "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
To: "'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Deleted a phone on accident
Message-ID:
<A607839BE5327F4DB0719710592119C9B15EDC6F62 at COFMAIL2.intra.co.fresno.ca.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
One of the ladies deleted a main line phone on accident. Of course she had to re-add all of the lines on the phone and the 24 port side cars.....I was trying to remember if there was a way to restore a accidental deletion? Is it possible to restore a deleted phone?
Thank you
Neal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/2f9d1dfc/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 40
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT: EIGRP question...
Message-ID:
<217811500.3429881271282509650.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Does anyone know how to show me all routes learned from a particular neighbour? I can do a show ip eigrp topology <network> <mask> and it shows me the neighbours it has learned that route from, but I want to know all the routes that that neighbour is advertising.
Any clues?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/7f7421a8/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 41
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:02:13 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
Cc: "'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Deleted a phone on accident
Message-ID: <4BC63B65.9070804 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
BARS or DRS restore is the only way.
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:39:31 PM, Haas, Neal
<nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
>
> One of the ladies deleted a main line phone on accident. Of course she
> had to re-add all of the lines on the phone and the 24 port side
> cars.....I was trying to remember if there was a way to restore a
> accidental deletion? Is it possible to restore a deleted phone?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Neal
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/13cbae06/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 42
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:11:36 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
Cc: Cisco-Voip-Puck <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process
Message-ID: <4BC63D98.4080302 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
CSCte21646 slp_srvreg process causes high cpu utilization
was recently in the hot issues report.
/Wes
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:28:19 PM, Carter, Bill
<bcarter at sentinel.com> wrote:
> I have 2 7825-I callmanagers. From cli show status shows CPU idle at
> about 45%. Through rtmt I see slp_svr process uses about 50% of the
> CPU. I think slp_svr relates to IBM mgmt tools. Anyone else seen this?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 43
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:40:37 +0200
From: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<q2v983dad191004141540k89ad89d2h9afc1b6cfa127807 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi, according to
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
--
Ratko
------------------------------
Message: 44
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:09:36 -0700
From: "Monica Hardy" <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Message-ID:
<1689825391190843B77E2B252432E89301B13ACF at rwc-exch-prd1.myopwv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello everyone,
I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method.
Everything is working except for complete caller-id.
For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote destination
profile and mobile voice access my
caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597. I have tried
a bunch of settings, any idea where I should
be looking at? I was under the impress that the call would be coming
back out of my PSTN gw, so I don't see why it
wouldn't work like it normally works when just calling out directly from
my desk phone?
Any ideas?
CCM 7.02
H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
-Monica
--------------------------------------------
Monica P. Hardy
Openwave
Sr. Network Engineer
Phone: 650-480-5597
email: monica.hardy at openwave.com <mailto:monica.hardy at openwave.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/77c46dd9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 2361 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/77c46dd9/attachment-0001.gif>
------------------------------
Message: 45
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:51:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<592001453.3443881271285492428.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
EVM-HD-8FXS/DID + 2 x 8 FXS modules = 24 FXS
you can do that twice, one in each NM/SM slot. So that gives you 48.
4 VWICs = 4 x 4 FXS = 16 + 48 = 64
Just an FYI though, you can probably by a four pack of VG224s cheaper than outfitting a router with FXS ports. You might want to price it out.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:40:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Hi, according to
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
--
Ratko
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/821cbbdf/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 46
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:06:11 -0700
From: Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com>
To: Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Message-ID:
<m2z2e7fff341004141606x45f31662x62be911048eaf552 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Is the calling party transform mask on your route pattern or route list set
to 650XXXX, or set to prefix 650? It looks like that's causing the system
to combine 650 with last four digits of your cell phone number.
Someone else will hopefully correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you'll
most likely need to use calling party transformations to expand the number
to ten digits. You'll want to create a new partition and a new CSS
containing only that partition. Create a new calling party transformation
pattern that matches the caller id of the cell phone, maybe
[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX and assign it to the partition you just created. Set the
calling party transform mask to ten X's. Once that's done, go to the
remote destination profile and uncheck Use Device Pool Calling Party
Transformation CSS and set the Calling Party Transformation CSS to the one
you just created. Save changes and test.
That's how I'm doing it anyway, but I haven't spent a lot time researching
proper usage of calling party transformations.
It sounds like you're using a external calling party mask of 650XXXX, or
perhaps prefixing 650 to the calling party mask on the route pattern or
route list.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method. Everything
> is working except for complete caller-id.
>
>
>
> For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote destination
> profile and mobile voice access my
>
> caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597. I have tried a
> bunch of settings, any idea where I should
>
> be looking at? I was under the impress that the call would be coming back
> out of my PSTN gw, so I don?t see why it
>
> wouldn?t work like it normally works when just calling out directly from my
> desk phone?
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> CCM 7.02
>
> H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
>
>
>
> -Monica
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> [image: cid:image001.gif at 01CA0FA5.8F211190]
>
>
>
> Monica P. Hardy
>
> Openwave
>
> Sr. Network Engineer
>
> Phone: 650-480-5597
>
> email: monica.hardy at openwave.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/c0c3ebde/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 47
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:08:57 -0700
From: Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com>
To: Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Message-ID:
<s2u2e7fff341004141608i9e644a3ek87c56d41fedd0bb4 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Sorry, I've presumed you're not prefixing 650 to the calling party number on
your h323 gateway using voice translation rules. If you are, you'll need
need to create an additional rule on the gateway to ensure calling number is
unchanged if it's already 10-digits.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the calling party transform mask on your route pattern or route list set
> to 650XXXX, or set to prefix 650? It looks like that's causing the system
> to combine 650 with last four digits of your cell phone number.
>
> Someone else will hopefully correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you'll
> most likely need to use calling party transformations to expand the number
> to ten digits. You'll want to create a new partition and a new CSS
> containing only that partition. Create a new calling party transformation
> pattern that matches the caller id of the cell phone, maybe
> [2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX and assign it to the partition you just created. Set the
> calling party transform mask to ten X's. Once that's done, go to the
> remote destination profile and uncheck Use Device Pool Calling Party
> Transformation CSS and set the Calling Party Transformation CSS to the one
> you just created. Save changes and test.
>
> That's how I'm doing it anyway, but I haven't spent a lot time researching
> proper usage of calling party transformations.
>
>
> It sounds like you're using a external calling party mask of 650XXXX, or
> perhaps prefixing 650 to the calling party mask on the route pattern or
> route list.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method. Everything
>> is working except for complete caller-id.
>>
>>
>>
>> For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote destination
>> profile and mobile voice access my
>>
>> caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597. I have tried a
>> bunch of settings, any idea where I should
>>
>> be looking at? I was under the impress that the call would be coming back
>> out of my PSTN gw, so I don?t see why it
>>
>> wouldn?t work like it normally works when just calling out directly from
>> my desk phone?
>>
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>>
>>
>> CCM 7.02
>>
>> H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
>>
>>
>>
>> -Monica
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: cid:image001.gif at 01CA0FA5.8F211190]
>>
>>
>>
>> Monica P. Hardy
>>
>> Openwave
>>
>> Sr. Network Engineer
>>
>> Phone: 650-480-5597
>>
>> email: monica.hardy at openwave.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/09c650c8/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 48
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:18:01 -0700
From: Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com>
To: Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DISA in CCM 4.1
Message-ID:
<o2r2e7fff341004141618y3d8963aajb157049bc7ccc901 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I could be wrong, but I don't believe Mobile Voice Access was available in
Call Manager 4.1.
In the past I've used an IPCC Express script to provide this functionality.
I believe you might also be able to provide similar functionality in Unity
be using the System Transfer feature via a caller input option on a Call
Handler or subscriber mailbox. You'll need to update the System Transfer
rules to allow transfer to the external numbers, as well as ensure the
Calling Search Space on the voicemail ports have outbound access. The piece
I can't remember is whether Unity will authenticate the user before allowing
the outbound call, but I believe the Subscriber System Transfer option does
just that.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Peter Slow <peter.slow at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tim,
> Look at Mobile Voice Access.
>
>
> http://www1.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/mobilapp.html#wp1043819
> "Mobile Voice Access (also referred to as System Remote Access) and
> Enterprise Feature Access two-stage dialing are features built on top
> of the Mobile Connect application. Both features allow a
> mobility-enabled user who is outside the enterprise to make a call as
> though they are directly connected to Unified CM. This functionality
> is commonly referred to as Direct Inward System Access (DISA) in
> traditional telephony environments."
> -peter
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Tim Foo <kinusca at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am asked to replicate the DISA feature in PBX world in CCM 4.1.
> >
> > We have MGCP gateway. We are having other group companies which are
> > connected to TIE lines and are accessible using some specific access
> code.
> >
> > So the user wants to be able to call-in and then get a second dial tone
> and
> > be able to call any other group companies which are connected to a trunk
> or
> > maybe able to call outside.
> >
> > Can you please send me the pointers to the configuration.
> >
> > Thanks
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/1a570a77/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 49
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:34:55 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
To: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
Cc: Cisco-Voip-Puck <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process
Message-ID: <8171A58C-E3C5-4782-9551-8161E7EA18F3 at sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks. I need to remeber how to search my rss feeds!
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:11 PM, "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> CSCte21646 slp_srvreg process causes high cpu utilization
> was recently in the hot issues report.
>
>
> /Wes
>
> On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:28:19 PM, Carter, Bill <bcarter at sentinel.com
> > wrote:
>> I have 2 7825-I callmanagers. From cli show status shows CPU idle
>> at about 45%. Through rtmt I see slp_svr process uses about 50% of
>> the CPU. I think slp_svr relates to IBM mgmt tools. Anyone else
>> seen this?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
------------------------------
Message: 50
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:35:55 +0200
From: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<i2n983dad191004141635tc086a1a9m4a84d9e814fd5f4b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I'm not really familiar with EVM-HD-8FXS/DID, can you please tell me
how can I use this to connect RJ-11 cable in? Some customer requires
VG with 48 FXS ports with RJ-11 interface for analog phones, but I
can't understand how this EVM-HD-8FXS/DID works.
Thanks
Ratko
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> EVM-HD-8FXS/DID + 2 x 8 FXS modules = 24 FXS
>
> you can do that twice, one in each NM/SM slot. So that gives you 48.
>
> 4 VWICs = 4 x 4 FXS = 16 + 48 = 64
>
> Just an FYI though, you can probably by a four pack of VG224s cheaper than
> outfitting a router with FXS ports. You might want to price it out.
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:40:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
>
> Hi, according to
> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
> it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
> through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
> seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
>
> --
> Ratko
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ratko
------------------------------
Message: 51
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<908294993.3457401271288744378.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
If you take a look at the data sheet, it explains that the module has an RJ21 connector. You can break this out with a pre-made panel from blackbox or do your own. With all FXS ports, it should be pretty easy.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps3115/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016c1c6_ps5855_Products_Data_Sheet.html
RJ-21 Distribution Panel
? MENTION OF NON-CISCO PRODUCTS OR SERVICES IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND CONSTITUTES NEITHER AN ENDORSEMENT NOR A RECOMMENDATION.
? Distribution panels are generally available from multiple cable and network adaptor vendors. Customers may, at their sole discretion, consider using a patch panel from Black Box Corporation. The Black Box patch panel accommodates RJ-11 and RJ-45 combinations and offers flexibility for expansion module upgrades (analog or digital). The Black Box patch panel is available direct from the manufacturer or from several national resellers and distributors.
? Black Box Corporation: http://blackbox.com/
? Technical support and ordering: 724 746-5500
? Black Box part number: JPM2194A
? Description: Distribution Panel for Cisco High Density Analog and Digital Extension Module for Voice and Fax (EVM-HD)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:35:55 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
I'm not really familiar with EVM-HD-8FXS/DID, can you please tell me
how can I use this to connect RJ-11 cable in? Some customer requires
VG with 48 FXS ports with RJ-11 interface for analog phones, but I
can't understand how this EVM-HD-8FXS/DID works.
Thanks
Ratko
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> EVM-HD-8FXS/DID + 2 x 8 FXS modules = 24 FXS
>
> you can do that twice, one in each NM/SM slot. So that gives you 48.
>
> 4 VWICs = 4 x 4 FXS = 16 + 48 = 64
>
> Just an FYI though, you can probably by a four pack of VG224s cheaper than
> outfitting a router with FXS ports. You might want to price it out.
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:40:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
>
> Hi, according to
> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
> it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
> through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
> seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
>
> --
> Ratko
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ratko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/d7ff4e13/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 52
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:46:36 -0500
From: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
To: "Cisco-Voip-Puck" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process
Message-ID:
<C0B4574561D1E04DBB500BA062BAF22601B11065 at Mail1.sentinel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
CPU utilization before utils snmp hardware-agents restart" = 65%
CPU utilization after utils snmp hardware-agents restart" = 1%
-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:12 PM
To: Carter, Bill
Cc: Cisco-Voip-Puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process
CSCte21646 slp_srvreg process causes high cpu utilization
was recently in the hot issues report.
/Wes
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:28:19 PM, Carter, Bill
<bcarter at sentinel.com> wrote:
> I have 2 7825-I callmanagers. From cli show status shows CPU idle at
> about 45%. Through rtmt I see slp_svr process uses about 50% of the
> CPU. I think slp_svr relates to IBM mgmt tools. Anyone else seen this?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 53
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:53:58 +0200
From: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<n2s983dad191004141653lee7cfb2ev7a20d2618fd5658 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Thanks Lelio... I saw the 4 pack VG224, and my god is cheap !!! I don't know
for how long this model will be on the market (warranty and support), but,
I'll sure take a look at...
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> If you take a look at the data sheet, it explains that the module has an
> RJ21 connector. You can break this out with a pre-made panel from blackbox
> or do your own. With all FXS ports, it should be pretty easy.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps3115/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016c1c6_ps5855_Products_Data_Sheet.html
>
> RJ-21 Distribution Panel
> ? MENTION OF NON-CISCO PRODUCTS OR SERVICES IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES
> ONLY AND CONSTITUTES NEITHER AN ENDORSEMENT NOR A RECOMMENDATION.
> ? Distribution panels are generally available from multiple cable and
> network adaptor vendors. Customers may, at their sole discretion, consider
> using a patch panel from Black Box Corporation. The Black Box patch panel
> accommodates RJ-11 and RJ-45 combinations and offers flexibility for
> expansion module upgrades (analog or digital). The Black Box patch panel is
> available direct from the manufacturer or from several national resellers
> and distributors.
> ? Black Box Corporation: http://blackbox.com/
> ? Technical support and ordering: 724 746-5500
> ? Black Box part number: JPM2194A
> ? Description: Distribution Panel for Cisco High Density Analog and
> Digital Extension Module for Voice and Fax (EVM-HD)
> ------------------------------
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:35:55 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
>
> I'm not really familiar with EVM-HD-8FXS/DID, can you please tell me
> how can I use this to connect RJ-11 cable in? Some customer requires
> VG with 48 FXS ports with RJ-11 interface for analog phones, but I
> can't understand how this EVM-HD-8FXS/DID works.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ratko
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
> > EVM-HD-8FXS/DID + 2 x 8 FXS modules = 24 FXS
> >
> > you can do that twice, one in each NM/SM slot. So that gives you 48.
> >
> > 4 VWICs = 4 x 4 FXS = 16 + 48 = 64
> >
> > Just an FYI though, you can probably by a four pack of VG224s cheaper
> than
> > outfitting a router with FXS ports. You might want to price it out.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> > - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:40:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
> >
> > Hi, according to
> > https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
> > it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
> > through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
> > seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
> >
> > --
> > Ratko
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ratko
>
--
Ratko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/cb97d958/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 54
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:01:49 -0700
From: Cristobal Priego <cristobalpriego at gmail.com>
To: "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Deleted a phone on accident
Message-ID: <2756A8DA-2932-4402-9E76-B31C3D38C8B9 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
If you have a good back up, do a restore, other than that I don't
think there is another option
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:39 PM, "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
> One of the ladies deleted a main line phone on accident. Of course
> she had to re-add all of the lines on the phone and the 24 port side
> cars?..I was trying to remember if there was a way to restore a acci
> dental deletion? Is it possible to restore a deleted phone?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Neal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 55
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<861975255.3463621271290177481.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I don't see the VG224 being end of life'd any time soon. They just (Dec '09?) EOL'ed the VG248.
It would suck if they did. With my calculations, any router based solution with max FXS ports, comes out to about double the cost per port.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:53:58 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Thanks Lelio... I saw the 4 pack VG224, and my god is cheap !!! I don't know for how long this model will be on the market (warranty and support), but, I'll sure take a look at...
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote:
If you take a look at the data sheet, it explains that the module has an RJ21 connector. You can break this out with a pre-made panel from blackbox or do your own. With all FXS ports, it should be pretty easy.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps3115/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016c1c6_ps5855_Products_Data_Sheet.html
RJ-21 Distribution Panel
? MENTION OF NON-CISCO PRODUCTS OR SERVICES IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND CONSTITUTES NEITHER AN ENDORSEMENT NOR A RECOMMENDATION.
? Distribution panels are generally available from multiple cable and network adaptor vendors. Customers may, at their sole discretion, consider using a patch panel from Black Box Corporation. The Black Box patch panel accommodates RJ-11 and RJ-45 combinations and offers flexibility for expansion module upgrades (analog or digital). The Black Box patch panel is available direct from the manufacturer or from several national resellers and distributors.
? Black Box Corporation: http://blackbox.com/
? Technical support and ordering: 724 746-5500
? Black Box part number: JPM2194A
? Description: Distribution Panel for Cisco High Density Analog and Digital Extension Module for Voice and Fax (EVM-HD)
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ratko Dodevski" < rade239 at gmail.com >
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" < lelio at uoguelph.ca >
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:35:55 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
I'm not really familiar with EVM-HD-8FXS/DID, can you please tell me
how can I use this to connect RJ-11 cable in? Some customer requires
VG with 48 FXS ports with RJ-11 interface for analog phones, but I
can't understand how this EVM-HD-8FXS/DID works.
Thanks
Ratko
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote:
> EVM-HD-8FXS/DID + 2 x 8 FXS modules = 24 FXS
>
> you can do that twice, one in each NM/SM slot. So that gives you 48.
>
> 4 VWICs = 4 x 4 FXS = 16 + 48 = 64
>
> Just an FYI though, you can probably by a four pack of VG224s cheaper than
> outfitting a router with FXS ports. You might want to price it out.
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ratko Dodevski" < rade239 at gmail.com >
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:40:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
>
> Hi, according to
> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
> it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
> through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
> seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
>
> --
> Ratko
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ratko
--
Ratko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/0b5d5a3c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 56
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Cristobal Priego <cristobalpriego at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Deleted a phone on accident
Message-ID:
<1040273690.3464801271290393801.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I had always thought that a nightly dump or phone export (all details) would allow you to input a deleted phone quickly by importing the details of that particular phone.
But from what I heard about an export taking 12 hours in v7, not so sure about that.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cristobal Priego" <cristobalpriego at gmail.com>
To: "Neal Haas" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:01:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Deleted a phone on accident
If you have a good back up, do a restore, other than that I don't
think there is another option
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:39 PM, "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
> One of the ladies deleted a main line phone on accident. Of course
> she had to re-add all of the lines on the phone and the 24 port side
> cars?..I was trying to remember if there was a way to restore a acci
> dental deletion? Is it possible to restore a deleted phone?
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Neal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/5897fd41/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 57
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:39:45 -0700
From: "Matthew Ballard" <mballard at otis.edu>
To: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>, "Lelio Fulgenzi"
<lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<2B6E230F0CB95F43990510BEB4CEE02A598BA7 at gispw3ex02.otis.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I don't see the VG224s being discontinued anytime soon. They are
comparatively new and fully supported (runs the same code including IOS
15 and commands as a router, does SCCP, MGCP, H.323, etc.). They are
basically Cisco routers specialized for analog voice usage. Since they
aren't modular they are cheaper to build and support.
They also come with RJ-21 connectors. Are ports in use distributed (ie
RJ-11 jacks in offices) or all connected in a single location? If
distributed, you can also just get a pre-wired 66 block with an RJ-21
connector, and then patch the wires in appropriately. That's what I do
off of our VG224.
Matthew Ballard
Network Manager
Otis College of Art and Design
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ratko Dodevski
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:54 PM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Thanks Lelio... I saw the 4 pack VG224, and my god is cheap !!! I don't
know for how long this model will be on the market (warranty and
support), but, I'll sure take a look at...
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
wrote:
If you take a look at the data sheet, it explains that the module has an
RJ21 connector. You can break this out with a pre-made panel from
blackbox or do your own. With all FXS ports, it should be pretty easy.
________________________________
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps3115/product_data_s
heet0900aecd8016c1c6_ps5855_Products_Data_Sheet.html
RJ-21 Distribution Panel
* MENTION OF NON-CISCO PRODUCTS OR SERVICES IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES
ONLY AND CONSTITUTES NEITHER AN ENDORSEMENT NOR A RECOMMENDATION.
* Distribution panels are generally available from multiple cable and
network adaptor vendors. Customers may, at their sole discretion,
consider using a patch panel from Black Box Corporation. The Black Box
patch panel accommodates RJ-11 and RJ-45 combinations and offers
flexibility for expansion module upgrades (analog or digital). The Black
Box patch panel is available direct from the manufacturer or from
several national resellers and distributors.
* Black Box Corporation: http://blackbox.com/
* Technical support and ordering: 724 746-5500
* Black Box part number: JPM2194A
* Description: Distribution Panel for Cisco High Density Analog and
Digital Extension Module for Voice and Fax (EVM-HD)
________________________________
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:35:55 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
I'm not really familiar with EVM-HD-8FXS/DID, can you please tell me
how can I use this to connect RJ-11 cable in? Some customer requires
VG with 48 FXS ports with RJ-11 interface for analog phones, but I
can't understand how this EVM-HD-8FXS/DID works.
Thanks
Ratko
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
wrote:
> EVM-HD-8FXS/DID + 2 x 8 FXS modules = 24 FXS
>
> you can do that twice, one in each NM/SM slot. So that gives you 48.
>
> 4 VWICs = 4 x 4 FXS = 16 + 48 = 64
>
> Just an FYI though, you can probably by a four pack of VG224s cheaper
than
> outfitting a router with FXS ports. You might want to price it out.
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ratko Dodevski" <rade239 at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:40:37 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
>
> Hi, according to
>
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
> it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
> through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
> seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
>
> --
> Ratko
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Ratko
--
Ratko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/d7075ea2/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 58
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:56:09 -0700
From: "Monica Hardy" <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
To: "Bill Talley" <btalley at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Message-ID:
<1689825391190843B77E2B252432E89301B13B5C at rwc-exch-prd1.myopwv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks Bill, but I am not following.
The calling party transform mask is set to 650480XXXX, it works fine on
this route pattern if I just call out from my desk phone, caller id will
be 650-480-5597.
Now if I call in to the call manager to the MVA number with my cell
phone, which is the a RDP and then call someone my caller id shows
650-5597. It leaves off the 480 prefix from my desk number. Isn't the
outgoing call using the same route pattern? so why would this change?
Also I have the box checked that says use the external mask of the phone
which is set to 650480XXXX.
-Monica
From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:06 PM
To: Monica Hardy
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Is the calling party transform mask on your route pattern or route list
set to 650XXXX, or set to prefix 650? It looks like that's causing
the system to combine 650 with last four digits of your cell phone
number.
Someone else will hopefully correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe
you'll most likely need to use calling party transformations to expand
the number to ten digits. You'll want to create a new partition and a
new CSS containing only that partition. Create a new calling party
transformation pattern that matches the caller id of the cell phone,
maybe [2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX and assign it to the partition you just
created. Set the calling party transform mask to ten X's. Once that's
done, go to the remote destination profile and uncheck Use Device Pool
Calling Party Transformation CSS and set the Calling Party
Transformation CSS to the one you just created. Save changes and test.
That's how I'm doing it anyway, but I haven't spent a lot time
researching proper usage of calling party transformations.
It sounds like you're using a external calling party mask of 650XXXX, or
perhaps prefixing 650 to the calling party mask on the route pattern or
route list.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Monica Hardy
<Monica.Hardy at openwave.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method.
Everything is working except for complete caller-id.
For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote destination
profile and mobile voice access my
caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597. I have tried
a bunch of settings, any idea where I should
be looking at? I was under the impress that the call would be coming
back out of my PSTN gw, so I don't see why it
wouldn't work like it normally works when just calling out directly from
my desk phone?
Any ideas?
CCM 7.02
H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
-Monica
--------------------------------------------
cid:image001.gif at 01CA0FA5.8F211190<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik
=c9e84c5231&view=att&th=127fe91537611995&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=0.
0.1&zw>
Monica P. Hardy
Openwave
Sr. Network Engineer
Phone: 650-480-5597
email: monica.hardy at openwave.com
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/130fd8a3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 59
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:22:54 +1000
From: Tim Smith <thsglobal at gmail.com>
To: "Haas, Neal" <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How to send inbound call to multiple
extensions
Message-ID:
<n2s202613021004141822i3d45fd43r3e111de9a3de01ac at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Just my opinion but I think voice hunt group and overlay dn's are more
flexible and better to maintain going forward.
Cheers,
Tim
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Haas, Neal <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
> It might be easier just to add the same extension on all of the phones.
>
> Neal Haas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ashwani Ranpise
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 8:16 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] How to send inbound call to multiple extensions
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> I am very new to voip. I have CME running on Cisco 1760 router. I have
> Vonage plugged into FXO port and 2 home phone on FXS port.
> How to send inbound call from PSTN to both phone ( I have tried plar
> command under FXO port but I am not understanding how to use RegEx to
> mask my 4 digit extensions). Thanks for your help in advance.
>
> FYI. Here is the configuration I have right now. It works with one
> extension but I want both phones to ring at the same time for INBOUND
> call.
>
> CME-1760#sh run | s voice-port
> voice-port 2/0
> input gain -6
> output attenuation -6
> echo-cancel coverage 32
> connection plar opx 1004 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> description Connection to Vonage
> caller-id enable
> voice-port 2/1
> voice-port 3/0
> station-id name xxxx
> station-id number 11111111111
> caller-id enable
> voice-port 3/1
> station-id name yyyyy
> caller-id enable
> CME-1760#
> CME-1760#sh run | s dial-peer
>
> dial-peer voice 1004 pots
> destination-pattern 1004
> port 3/0
> dial-peer voice 1005 pots
> destination-pattern 1005
> port 3/1
> dial-peer voice 100 pots
> destination-pattern 1[2-9]..[2-9]......
> incoming called-number .
> direct-inward-dial
> port 2/0
> forward-digits all
> dial-peer voice 101 pots
> destination-pattern [2-9]..[2-9]......
> incoming called-number .
> direct-inward-dial
> port 2/0
> forward-digits all
> dial-peer voice 102 pots
> destination-pattern 011T
> port 2/0
> forward-digits all
> dial-peer voice 103 pots
> destination-pattern *123
> no digit-strip
> port 2/0
> CME-1760#
>
> Thanks,
> Ashwani
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
--
Cheers,
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/f42cd59d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 60
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:55:59 -0700
From: Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com>
To: Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
Cc: "<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Message-ID: <A02EE203-320E-4D8E-977F-8A536157007C at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed";
DelSp="yes"
Sorry Monica. I'm referring to calling party transformation patterns
under the call routing menu.
Sent from a mobile device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.
Please excuse my typos.
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:56 PM, "Monica Hardy"
<Monica.Hardy at openwave.com> wrote:
> Thanks Bill, but I am not following.
>
>
>
> The calling party transform mask is set to 650480XXXX, it works fine
> on this route pattern if I just call out from my desk phone, caller
> id will be 650-480-5597.
>
>
>
> Now if I call in to the call manager to the MVA number with my cell
> phone, which is the a RDP and then call someone my caller id shows 650-5597
> . It leaves off the 480 prefix from my desk number. Isn?t the outg
> oing call using the same route pattern? so why would this change?
>
>
>
> Also I have the box checked that says use the external mask of the
> phone which is set to 650480XXXX.
>
>
>
> -Monica
>
>
>
> From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:06 PM
> To: Monica Hardy
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
>
>
>
> Is the calling party transform mask on your route pattern or route
> list set to 650XXXX, or set to prefix 650? It looks like that's
> causing the system to combine 650 with last four digits of your cell
> phone number.
>
> Someone else will hopefully correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe
> you'll most likely need to use calling party transformations to
> expand the number to ten digits. You'll want to create a new
> partition and a new CSS containing only that partition. Create a new
> calling party transformation pattern that matches the caller id of
> the cell phone, maybe [2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX and assign it to the
> partition you just created. Set the calling party transform mask to
> ten X's. Once that's done, go to the remote destination profile
> and uncheck Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation CSS and set
> the Calling Party Transformation CSS to the one you just created.
> Save changes and test.
>
> That's how I'm doing it anyway, but I haven't spent a lot time
> researching proper usage of calling party transformations.
>
>
> It sounds like you're using a external calling party mask of
> 650XXXX, or perhaps prefixing 650 to the calling party mask on the
> route pattern or route list.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com
> > wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method.
> Everything is working except for complete caller-id.
>
>
>
> For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote
> destination profile and mobile voice access my
>
> caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597. I have
> tried a bunch of settings, any idea where I should
>
> be looking at? I was under the impress that the call would be
> coming back out of my PSTN gw, so I don?t see why it
>
> wouldn?t work like it normally works when just calling out directly
> from my desk phone?
>
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
>
> CCM 7.02
>
> H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
>
>
>
> -Monica
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Monica P. Hardy
>
> Openwave
>
> Sr. Network Engineer
>
> Phone: 650-480-5597
>
> email: monica.hardy at openwave.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100414/1ba2f48a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 61
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:08:46 +1000
From: jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net, ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of
Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?
Message-ID:
<o2gf3f10eb11004141908xf47a91etd8b7584b9013aa83 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of operation in
CUCM 7.0.1?
I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area. It should
override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
relationship?
Cheers
Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/089af596/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 62
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: lelio at uoguelph.ca
To: jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com>
Cc: "ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of
operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?
Message-ID: <48F29DB2-EA89-4616-8347-2AA0923122A6 at uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:
gateway overrides RL
RL overrides RG
RG overrides RP
RP overrides phone
Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.
Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
Computing & Communications
University of Guelph
519-824-4120 x56354
...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
[XKJ2000]
On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of
> operation in CUCM 7.0.1?
>
>
> I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area. It
> should override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
>
> What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
>
>
>
> I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
> relationship?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 63
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:22:40 +1000
From: jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com>
To: lelio at uoguelph.ca
Cc: "ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of
operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?
Message-ID:
<m2xf3f10eb11004141922m2ae9b852sfe35da9a147f0a09 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
well, I know this order but CngPTP break these rules.
Check out this scenario: call---->TP---->RP-----------> SLRG----->GW
,check EPNM on TP and RP ,put CngPTP on GW. it overrides.
,check EPNM only on RP ,put CngPTP on GW. it does not override.
,check EPNM only on TP ,put CngPTP on GW. it overrides.
How these mess works with CngPTP?
Jeremy
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:
>
> gateway overrides RL
> RL overrides RG
> RG overrides RP
> RP overrides phone
>
> Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
> Computing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
>
> On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of operation
>> in CUCM 7.0.1?
>>
>>
>> I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area. It should
>> override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
>>
>> What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
>> relationship?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jeremy
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/6551281d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 64
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: lelio at uoguelph.ca
To: jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com>
Cc: "ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of
operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?
Message-ID: <CB0E008F-A02D-47C1-8BCF-01F5F3E1417E at uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
DelSp="yes"
Sorry, I'm not familiar with those parameters. I'll take a look at my
lab server later.
Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
Computing & Communications
University of Guelph
519-824-4120 x56354
...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
[XKJ2000]
On 2010-04-14, at 10:22 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
> well, I know this order but CngPTP break these rules.
>
> Check out this scenario: call---->TP---->RP-----------> SLRG----->GW
>
> ,check EPNM on TP and RP ,put CngPTP on GW. it overrides.
> ,check EPNM only on RP ,put CngPTP on GW. it does not override.
> ,check EPNM only on TP ,put CngPTP on GW. it overrides.
>
>
>
> How these mess works with CngPTP?
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:
>
> gateway overrides RL
> RL overrides RG
> RG overrides RP
> RP overrides phone
>
> Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
> Computing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
>
> On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of
> operation in CUCM 7.0.1?
>
>
> I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area. It
> should override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
>
> What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
>
>
>
> I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
> relationship?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/08bb64cb/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 65
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:15:17 +0100
From: <kevin.hobson2000 at ntlworld.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Brent Phone Issue beeps when key is turned
Message-ID:
<20100415101517.C7JOU.47552.root at web01-winn.ispmail.private.ntl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi, All
I have a problem i have banging my head against a brick wall with for months.
Before i start though is there anyone who has ever worked with or implemented Brent phones?
Thanks
Kev
------------------------------
Message: 66
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:21:59 -0400
From: David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Headsets and Lifters
Message-ID:
<s2o1a594c811004150521wd4bd0164r7fccce5750c5f061 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have an employee who wants a headset for a 7940. She also wants the
little mechanical "lifter". She doesn't need that does she? I would think
that if a call comes in and you're wearing the headset, you just press
"Headset" to take the call?? Am I wrong? She is looking at the Plantronics
CS55 and HL10 lifter, do I need any special cables to interface them to the
7940?
Thank you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/a494a12b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 67
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:27:14 -0400
From: David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Convert MGCP to H323 (CCM4.1)
Message-ID:
<u2q1a594c811004150527gd01688b1q810f2373a4b50d63 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I want to convert one of my 2801s to H.323 from MGCP. I have a good
understanding of the steps I'll need to do on the 2801, do I need to do any
changes to the router's info in CCM? [CCM4.1(3)]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/ae469ea7/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 68
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:34:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Headsets and Lifters
Message-ID:
<12740635.3584761271334897448.JavaMail.root at simcoe.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
the mechanical lifter really only helps if you are away from the desk i believe. that way you touch a button on your headset and it answers the call.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Zhars" <dzhars at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:21:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] Headsets and Lifters
I have an employee who wants a headset for a 7940. She also wants the little mechanical "lifter". She doesn't need that does she? I would think that if a call comes in and you're wearing the headset, you just press "Headset" to take the call?? Am I wrong? She is looking at the Plantronics CS55 and HL10 lifter, do I need any special cables to interface them to the 7940?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/af23f2e1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 69
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:38:34 -0400
From: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Headsets and Lifters
Message-ID:
<530C67FE62559C42857C78B962454E62076D663756 at hermes.helion.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
If you don?t have a phone that does not supports electronic hookswitch (which a 7940 does not) it can make things a bit easier as you don?t have to worry about the headset button at all
Matthew Loraditch, CCNA, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593
Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:35 AM
To: David Zhars
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Headsets and Lifters
the mechanical lifter really only helps if you are away from the desk i believe. that way you touch a button on your headset and it answers the call.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Zhars" <dzhars at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:21:59 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] Headsets and Lifters
I have an employee who wants a headset for a 7940. She also wants the little mechanical "lifter". She doesn't need that does she? I would think that if a call comes in and you're wearing the headset, you just press "Headset" to take the call?? Am I wrong? She is looking at the Plantronics CS55 and HL10 lifter, do I need any special cables to interface them to the 7940?
Thank you!
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/85b4ff6f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 70
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:54:02 -0500
From: Dennis Heim <Dennis.Heim at cdw.com>
To: David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Convert MGCP to H323 (CCM4.1)
Message-ID:
<7DF1C42555B37D4BAAD236799B2D059325617E9EB4 at EXMB4ILVH.corp.cdw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You will have to add the gateway as an H.323 gateway and add that gateway to all necessary route groups.
Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN 46032
317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com<mailto:dennis.heim at cdw.com>
www.berbee.com<http://www.berbee.com/>
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Zhars
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:27 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Convert MGCP to H323 (CCM4.1)
I want to convert one of my 2801s to H.323 from MGCP. I have a good understanding of the steps I'll need to do on the 2801, do I need to do any changes to the router's info in CCM? [CCM4.1(3)]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/07a18e64/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 71
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:48:54 -0400
From: Justin Steinberg <jsteinberg at gmail.com>
To: "Curtis, Adam" <ACurtis at pizzagalli.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Translation Equivalent to *67
Message-ID:
<i2yf1b65f881004150748gf00d5088k445211a16f740452 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
unless you have put in other restrictions, this allows anyone to dial *67
and international numbers without restriction.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Curtis, Adam <ACurtis at pizzagalli.com>wrote:
> Thanks Lelio, this worked perfectly. I was able to create a translation
> pattern of *67@ with the NANP number plan and just removed everything
> PreAt. Everything going out from this point comes up as restricted.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> *Adam Curtis*
>
> *Pizzagalli Construction Company*
>
> *IT Support Technician*
>
> *(802) 651-1319*
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 14, 2010 9:30 AM
> *To:* Curtis, Adam
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Translation Equivalent to *67
>
>
>
> It should be possible. The hardest part will be positioning the *67
> correctly to ensure it gets dropped and getting dial tone to work properly.
> I might stick with 9*67.@ as your route pattern. Then simply set calling
> party to restricted.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Curtis" <ACurtis at pizzagalli.com>
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:54:05 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Translation Equivalent to *67
>
>
> One of our employees is looking for a feature equivalent to *67 that will
> block their outgoing caller ID on certain calls. Is it possible to create a
> translation pattern to do this that someone has done before? I?m not sure if
> it?s even possible so any help would be appreciated. We are using CUCM
> 7.0(2).
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> *Adam Curtis*
>
> *Pizzagalli Construction Company*
>
> *IT Support Technician*
>
> *(802) 651-1319*
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/2e7ff1d5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 72
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:56:31 -0400
From: Mike King <me at mpking.com>
To: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: EIGRP question...
Message-ID:
<g2n33b76eed1004150756ld1489c02x5514a4dd661d7816 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The only suggestion, which is not what your looking for, is to throw a
all-links on there...
show ip eigrp topology all-links
But I'm not sure if it will show all routes that it's advertising.
Definitely not in the format that would make it quickly read.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to show me all routes learned from a particular
> neighbour? I can do a show ip eigrp topology <network> <mask> and it shows
> me the neighbours it has learned that route from, but I want to know all the
> routes that that neighbour is advertising.
>
> Any clues?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
> - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/9a3d8581/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 73
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:08:55 -0400
From: "Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila" <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>
To: Ratko Dodevski <rade239 at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Message-ID:
<38192AC07454A04196E4E021D411F918149DD396C0 at exch.Netxar.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
A box with two EVM-HD-8FXS/DID plus the two EM3-HDA-8FXS/DID 8-port voice/fax expansion module gives you 32 fxs ports add 4 Vic3-4FXS and you reach 48 ports. Keep in mind this box be able to do about anything.
Jorge Rodriguez
Senior Voice/Data Consultant
Netxar Technologies
PCS 7876888530
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ratko Dodevski
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:41 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] 2951 with 64 FXS ports
Hi, according to
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10537/prod_series_comparison.html
it says that 2951 support up to 64 FXS ports but i cant configure
through the configuration tool. I need it with 48 FXS ports, but it
seems like i can't put more then 32 (2 NM with 2x4FXS and 4x4FXS).
--
Ratko
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 74
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:41:15 +0530
From: venkata sashank <reachsashank at gmail.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] SUB: Regd Unity 7.0 installation
Message-ID:
<o2g7f6634f91004150811o12372c12qa60ca0e8e98d109e at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi,
This is my first installation of unity. Customer require voice messaging
alone. So i started installing and everything went smooth untill i stucked
up with exchang. Customer has got Exchange 2008 and in the doc i see that
only exchange 2003 integration method is there. Should i use the exchange
2003 deployment options or else should i go any other software that needed
to be downloaded. Kindly help me out in this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/be9a8cae/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 75
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:27:17 -0400
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com>
To: jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com>
Cc: "ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice at onlinestudylist.com>,
"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of
operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?
Message-ID:
<l2u22e6380b1004150827h6a62a32fp232c4c7180554a28 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
1. External Phone Number Mask on calling device.
2. Translation Pattern.
3. Route Pattern.
4. Route List using Route Group details.
5. Transformation on the terminating device.
AFAIK that is officially how its "SUPPOSED" to work... As with most things
with in CUCM YMMV...
Also keep in mind that "Use Calling Party\'s External Phone Number Mask"
flagged to Yes should override anything set on the RP and TP and reset CPN
to EPNM but should still be overwritten by the GW
DNA might be an quick way to test as opposed to using q931 debugs on the GW.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
> well, I know this order but CngPTP break these rules.
>
> Check out this scenario: call---->TP---->RP-----------> SLRG----->GW
>
> ,check EPNM on TP and RP ,put CngPTP on GW. it overrides.
> ,check EPNM only on RP ,put CngPTP on GW. it does not override.
> ,check EPNM only on TP ,put CngPTP on GW. it overrides.
>
>
>
> How these mess works with CngPTP?
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>> The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:
>>
>> gateway overrides RL
>> RL overrides RG
>> RG overrides RP
>> RP overrides phone
>>
>> Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.
>>
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
>> Computing & Communications
>> University of Guelph
>> 519-824-4120 x56354
>>
>> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>>
>> [XKJ2000]
>>
>>
>> On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of operation
>>> in CUCM 7.0.1?
>>>
>>>
>>> I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area. It should
>>> override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
>>>
>>> What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
>>> relationship?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/3023f350/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 76
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:40:21 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com>
Cc: Cisco-Voip-Puck <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Ucm 7.1(3) slp_svr process
Message-ID: <4BC73365.3000608 at cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I eventually found it using Bug Toolkit as well:
Product: Cisco Unified Communications Manager(CallManager)
Version: 7.1
Keywords: slp_srvreg AND cpu
note: the AND must be there and must be capitalized.
/Wes
On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 7:34:55 PM, Carter, Bill
<bcarter at sentinel.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I need to remeber how to search my rss feeds!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:11 PM, "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> CSCte21646 slp_srvreg process causes high cpu utilization
>> was recently in the hot issues report.
>>
>>
>> /Wes
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:28:19 PM, Carter, Bill
>> <bcarter at sentinel.com> wrote:
>>> I have 2 7825-I callmanagers. From cli show status shows CPU idle at
>>> about 45%. Through rtmt I see slp_svr process uses about 50% of the
>>> CPU. I think slp_svr relates to IBM mgmt tools. Anyone else seen this?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
------------------------------
Message: 77
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:59:04 -0700
From: "Monica Hardy" <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com>
To: "Bill Talley" <btalley at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Message-ID:
<1689825391190843B77E2B252432E89301B13C13 at rwc-exch-prd1.myopwv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks Bill, I tried it and bunch of other stuff?.still no go.
I finally fixed it?I didn?t realize that the Line in RDP was not a true shared line. Meaning, that even though I have External Phone Mask set on my normal line and I am using that same line in the RDP, I still have to set AGAIN the External Phone number mask.
Thanks for your help.
-Monica
From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:56 PM
To: Monica Hardy
Cc: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Sorry Monica. I'm referring to calling party transformation patterns under the call routing menu.
Sent from a mobile device with very tiny touchscreen input keys. Please excuse my typos.
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:56 PM, "Monica Hardy" <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com> wrote:
Thanks Bill, but I am not following.
The calling party transform mask is set to 650480XXXX, it works fine on this route pattern if I just call out from my desk phone, caller id will be 650-480-5597.
Now if I call in to the call manager to the MVA number with my cell phone, which is the a RDP and then call someone my caller id shows 650-5597. It leaves off the 480 prefix from my desk number. Isn?t the outgoing call using the same route pattern? so why would this change?
Also I have the box checked that says use the external mask of the phone which is set to 650480XXXX.
-Monica
From: Bill Talley [mailto:btalley at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:06 PM
To: Monica Hardy
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Voice Access - Caller ID
Is the calling party transform mask on your route pattern or route list set to 650XXXX, or set to prefix 650? It looks like that's causing the system to combine 650 with last four digits of your cell phone number.
Someone else will hopefully correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you'll most likely need to use calling party transformations to expand the number to ten digits. You'll want to create a new partition and a new CSS containing only that partition. Create a new calling party transformation pattern that matches the caller id of the cell phone, maybe [2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX and assign it to the partition you just created. Set the calling party transform mask to ten X's. Once that's done, go to the remote destination profile and uncheck Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation CSS and set the Calling Party Transformation CSS to the one you just created. Save changes and test.
That's how I'm doing it anyway, but I haven't spent a lot time researching proper usage of calling party transformations.
It sounds like you're using a external calling party mask of 650XXXX, or perhaps prefixing 650 to the calling party mask on the route pattern or route list.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Monica Hardy <Monica.Hardy at openwave.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I setup the Mobile Voice Access using the hairpinning method. Everything is working except for complete caller-id.
For example if I call out from my cell phone using my remote destination profile and mobile voice access my
caller-id will be shown as 6505597 instead of 6504805597. I have tried a bunch of settings, any idea where I should
be looking at? I was under the impress that the call would be coming back out of my PSTN gw, so I don?t see why it
wouldn?t work like it normally works when just calling out directly from my desk phone?
Any ideas?
CCM 7.02
H323 GW 12.4.24.T3
-Monica
--------------------------------------------
cid:image001.gif at 01CA0FA5.8F211190<https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=c9e84c5231&view=att&th=127fe91537611995&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=0.0.1&zw>
Monica P. Hardy
Openwave
Sr. Network Engineer
Phone: 650-480-5597
email: monica.hardy at openwave.com
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/a4a7bfe1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 78, Issue 16
******************************************
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list