[cisco-voip] UCCx RM user Max Associations?

[Anthony Holloway]

Don't forget that the reason why you associate phones to the rmcm user is so
the UCCX rmcm subsystem can monitor their state (idle, ringing, transfer,
etc.).

So, even if the CallManager can handle the association, UCCX may not be able
to keep up with all the events from 1,600 phones.

Anthony

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com>wrote:

> I don't recall ever seeing a limit to the associations. (It's a tiny
> record in the database anyway). While UCCX may only support 300
> agents, those 300 agents could potentially log in to any phone in the
> cluster via extension mobility and take acd calls.
>
> You could raise an issue with TAC to get a definite answer but I have
> seen more than 2000 devices being associated to a application user in
> the past. I don't think you'll have any problems.
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Anthony Holloway
> <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com <avholloway%2Bcisco-voip at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > I wouldn't associate that many.  Go dig through the SRND, I'm sure it
> says
> > something about this in there.
> > Or if you're too lazy, consider this:  the maximum limit of agents (or
> > phones) on UCCX is 300.
> > Spend the time now, to update the descriptions on your Agent phones to
> > include an identifier e.g., "Agent - Anthony Holloway - 5938".  This way
> you
> > can add phone associations to the rmcm user by simply saying: description
> > contains agent.
> > Anthony
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> we are migrating from UCCx 4 to 7.
> >> My question is can I associate all our Phones 1600+ to the RM user. or
> >> should I take the time and only associate the ~100 needed?
> >> we just thought it could be easier in the long run of everything some
> >> phone needs to be added to just have them all added ahead of time.
> >> I seem to remember there is some kind of a top number you don't want to
> >> exceed.  Does anyone know the number?
> >> Thanks
> >> Scott
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100917/798e80c3/attachment.html>