[cisco-voip] digitized voice quality
Pawlowski, Adam
ajp26 at buffalo.edu
Mon Jul 13 11:15:34 EDT 2020
That and what the regional bandwidth/codec lists are set to
Perhaps some calls are using g729 or something which would sound pretty gross on a PC headset in comparison to opus or even g711
From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 11:08 AM
To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] digitized voice quality
Who is hearing the poor audio, the jabber user? the person the jabber user is speaking to? is this jabber to jabber only? is this over wlan or lan?
One idea for why audio sucks but audio+video doesn't is that your priority queue is dropping packets and when video is added both audio and video are af41 and therefore circumvents the priority queue.
Can you confirm the dscp values on the voice stream for a voice only versus voice+video call?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:51 AM Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com<mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
All--
we are using Jabber 12.8 with CM 12.5 in a voice only mode. we have users reporting digitized voice call quality. has anyone else been dealing with this?
we have had multiple users say if they add Video to the call it makes it better. Anyone else seeing that? Any ideas why that would be better?
what else can we do to make this work better? TAC has not been able to help with this after multiple weeks of engagement.
any thoughts?
TIA
Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20200713/c6a1a133/attachment.htm>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list