[VoiceOps] analog pulse dialing solutions

[Colin]

KQtek out of taiwan makes a voip ata(EMG202) based around Dial-up.  Its definitely an experience, but is "widely" used in parts of Africa.  www.kqtek.com/p_EMG202.htm

There site appears to be unreachable right now but i know a few companies that support it such as Delta3 & Talkfree.

Colin


On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Lee Riemer wrote:

> I've had success using dial-up internet over a voip connection.  Latency was 400+ms to the gateway.  I wouldn't recommend it as a pleasurable experience, but it worked.
> 
> On 12/9/2009 11:14 AM, Carlos Alcantar wrote:
>> On another note have you do you know if the alarm modem will work over
>> voip?  With my experience fax works with t.38 normal modem calls not so
>> well. Hit and miss.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org
>> [mailto:voiceops-bounces at voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Paul Timmins
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 7:05 AM
>> To: Brian_Tate at syncglobal.net
>> Cc: VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] analog pulse dialing solutions
>> 
>> It might be cheaper to pay to upgrade their alarm panel, just a thought.
>> 
>> Brian Tate wrote:
>>   
>>> Thanks for all the pointers!
>>> 
>>> The application is supporting an old alarm system that only supports
>>>     
>> pulse
>>   
>>> dialing over an analog line.  The customer is located in a rural area.
>>>     
>>   
>>> > From what I have found so far, only the Innomedia models seems to
>>>     
>> explicitly
>>   
>>> support the feature.  We aren't a Cisco shop.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Matt Yaklin [mailto:myaklin at g4.net]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:17 PM
>>> To: Paul Timmins
>>> Cc: Brian_Tate at syncglobal.net; VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] analog pulse dialing solutions
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I cannot even think of a legacy setup that would require pulse
>>>     
>> dialing...
>>   
>>> It must be a heck of a customer account to warrant putting in this
>>> research and work to get their contract.
>>> 
>>> One has to wonder if you could just go on ebay and buy them a new kit
>>> for 99 bucks and it would be 15 years newer yet still 10 years old ;-)
>>> Here customer, a freebie!
>>> 
>>> Just for curiousity sake could you share with us the legacy setup that
>>> got you onto this path?
>>> 
>>> But some google foo turned up URLs like this:
>>> http://soundwin.co.uk/s202.html
>>> 
>>> which says it supports pulse dialing.
>>> Pulse Dial support: Support pulse dialing generation and
>>> detection.(Optional)
>>> 
>>> good luck and let us know how it all works out.
>>> 
>>> matt at g4.net
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Paul Timmins wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>     
>>>> And someone here was saying that technologies obsoleted by better
>>>>       
>> options
>>   
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>> die
>>> 
>>>     
>>>> a quick death. Hah! :)
>>>> 
>>>> Brian Tate wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>>>> Can anyone share experience with supporting legacy systems that
>>>>>         
>> require
>>   
>>>>> analog pulse dialing?
>>>>> 
>>>>> It seems that SIP ATA?s and VoIP media gateways prefer tone dialing
>>>>> instead.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do the ?dial pulse to DTMF? converters really work for business
>>>>>         
>> class
>>   
>>>>> services?
>>>>> 
>>>>> ?Anyone selling good implementations of US Patent 6914978?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Brian
>>>>> 
>>>>> * SyncGlobal, a DoveTel Communications Company ***
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Engineer 678-821-1129 *
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Brian_Tate at SyncGlobal.net<mailto:Brian_Tate at SyncGlobal.net>  *
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>   
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> VoiceOps mailing list
>>>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>         
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> VoiceOps mailing list
>>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VoiceOps mailing list
>>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>> 
>>> 
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20091209/bd8f60c4/attachment-0001.html>