[VoiceOps] 911 address policy for company phones at home

[Carlos Alvarez]

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Jay Hennigan <jay at west.net> wrote:

>
> But there are no "lines" for DID-less extensions or for that matter an
> "installation" in the case of softphones.
>

But it's trivial for any VoIP system to add a DID to a device.  Therefore
would the FCC or a lawyer in a civil suit argue that there was no
technological impediment to you providing proper e911 service?  The FCC
says that customers can't opt out of 911 service, would they also claim
that they can't opt out of a DID and address service for remote phones?

-- 
Carlos Alvarez
TelEvolve
602-889-3003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130118/a0774c56/attachment.html>