[VoiceOps] Multi Tenant Commercial Softswitch Besides Broadsoft

[MiRTA PBX team]

It is really hard to define a max load for a dynamic system. I haven't done
any real testing, however my biggest client, using a two nodes system, is
managing over than 250 clients with over than 3000 extensions registered
and making/receiving more than 50000 calls every day. The system is smooth
and the client is happy. I have no idea how many concurrent calls is
handling.

Leandro


2014-08-07 17:01 GMT+02:00 Peter Rad. <peter at 4isps.com>:

>
> From what I have been told, Asterisk can handle 300 simultaneous calls per
> user. Most ITSPs wouldn't know because they aren't seeing that kind of
> volume.
>
> Cbeyond bought a company called Aretta that did Asterisk in containers -
> one for each customer. It became unmanageable.
>
> Just some thoughts this morning.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On 8/6/2014 7:28 PM, MiRTA PBX team wrote:
>
> I found really time and resource consuming having an asterisk (even if
> virtualized) for each client. I see a lots of companies failing when
> reaching around 40/50 virtual severs. The time needed to maintain all these
> servers were too big for the money the clients can provide. I think it is
> more convenient to have a multi tenant setup where a single central
> asterisk handle all the virtual pbx for the clients. The resources needed
> for a new client are almost zero and you can acquire even little office
> with just a couple of phones.
>
>  Leandro
>
>
> 2014-08-06 19:24 GMT+02:00 Aryn Nakaoka 808.356.2901 <
> anakaoka at trinet-hi.com>:
>
>>  We use a virtualized asterisk per client - makes feature sets very
>> powerful. Then we have a centralized core for additional features that
>> Asterisk can not provide.  Its not auto provisioning, but we're aiming for
>> B2B vs. self-service market. Billing is done via flat rate or A2Billing.
>>
>>  It'll come close to meta switch or broad soft but you will need to
>> service your clients. BUT you wold be 100% opensource.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aryn H. K. Nakaoka
>> anakaoka at trinet-hi.com
>>
>> Direct: 808.356.2901
>> Fax : 808.356.2919
>>
>>  Call me with our Browser Phone : https://encrypted.alohatone.com/3562901
>>
>> Tri-net Solutions
>> 733 Bishop St. #1170
>> Honolulu, HI 96813
>> http://www.trinet-hi.com
>>
>> Aloha Tone PBX  http://youtu.be/27v2wbnFIDs
>>
>>  EncryptedHawaii.com : http://tinyurl.com/emailchainofcustody
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information contained in this email and any
>> attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.
>> Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments by
>> persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
>> have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by
>> replying to the message and deleting this email and any attachments from
>> your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:38 AM, MiRTA PBX team <info at mirtapbx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I almost agree with you, but I think instead of saying "The drawback to
>>> Asterisk is you have to add lots of extra stuff" I will say "The drawback
>>> to Asterisk is you have to DISABLE a lots of extra stuff". Yes, if you are
>>> doing a pure SIP routing, you may disable IAX and all other VoIP protocol
>>> you do not need, you may disable all applications you don't use and reduce
>>> asterisk to the bare minimum, but are they really hurting you? I cannot
>>> compare asterisk to other VoIP software because I just know asterisk, but
>>> having something "more" was never been a problem. Problems can arise when
>>> you need a feature and you do not have it. We are working in a highly
>>> competitive market where we fight to the death for every single customer,
>>> trying to pleasant them as much as we can. Often clients have silly
>>> requests and I appreciate when I have a software even capable to play chess
>>> with the caller while on hold.
>>>
>>>  Leandro
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Eric Wieling <EWieling at nyigc.com>:
>>>
>>>>    A well spec’d Asterisk box can handle well 500+ calls if audio is
>>>> not going through Asterisk.    The drawback to Asterisk is you have to add
>>>> lots of extra stuff. The few GUIs availabe for Asterisk are all designed
>>>> for SMBs, not for a carrier.  I love Asterisk, but it would not come close
>>>> to fufilling the original poster’s needs for things like SMS (for some
>>>> values of “SMS”).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> VoiceOps at voiceops.org
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20140807/638605a5/attachment.html>